This Week in Google 260 (Transcript)
Netcasts you love, from people you trust.This is TWiT! Bandwidth for
This Week in Google is provided by Cachefly. C-a-c-h-e-f-l-y.com.
Leo Laporte:
This is TWiG - This Week in Google, episode 260,
recorded July 30, 2014
Living La Vida Cloudy
It’s
time for TWiG - This Week in Google, the show that
covers Google, the cloud, the Twitter, the Facebook, whatever our esteemed
panelists want to talk about. That's because they're so esteemed. He's just
steamed, that's Jeff Jarvis, the king of the rant, from the City University of
New York.
Jeff Jarvis: Cooling down my bursitis.
Leo: Oh, ow.
What is bursitis? Is that a painful butt?
Gina Trapani: Awww.
Jeff: Well, actually that's where it is,
yes. It’s inflammation of the bursa.
Leo: Ooh. Okay.
Jeff: Don't be sixty, people. Don't do
it.
Leo: It’s all downhill now, Jeff.
Gina: I thought it was an inflamed bro.
Leo: Anyway, I'm sorry. Jeff has had a
no good, terrible, very bad day. A flat tire, a broken mech,
a lightbulb just blew out. You should just get under
the covers.
Jeff: Yesterday I had a three o'clock
appointment and a four o'clock appointment and I transposed them in my other
calendar, so I told them both to change, realizing I was wrong for each to try
to get back ahold of them to make sure it was back where it was... I'm telling
you, it’s not working.
Leo: Let’s just take it easy today. It’s
going to be a nice day. Relaxing, fun day, gathering with the
friends. Jeff is a blogger at Buzzmachine.com, author of Public Parts,
What Would Google Do, and many other wonderful things. Gina Trapani's here,
founding editor of LifeHacker, host of All About Android. She's the creator of ThinkUp,
a fabulous analytics platform for your social media. Thinkup.com.
Gina: Yes, hello.
Leo: Hey.
Gina: Happy to be here. I like kinda chill days.
Leo: We're going to chill today.
Gina: We can talk about Jeff's computer
decision.
Jeff: Let's talk about my computer
decision, yeah.
Leo: Wait a minute. What computer
decision?
Jeff: Well, my Mac is borked.
Leo: So you're gonna...
You need... Well, you know it’s perfect because Apple just came out with new
Mac Pros. Do you want a desktop, a laptop, what do you want?
Jeff: Well, you're going to make fun, but
this is the advancement of the world, you're living in
the past. I'm debating getting anything.
Leo: You don't need a computer, hell no.
Get a chrome...
Jeff: The idea that you have to have a computer upon which you download things and store things,
was an idea for a while. But the structure of phones, where you have local apps
but basically all your data is up somewhere else, that's the way it operates
and the apps can operate anywhere, the way Chrome operates. It’s the same
architecture. I'm thinking the only reason I got your - what's your box, your
thing - what's the printer box that you advertised once?
Leo: Oh yeah, the Xprintserver,
yeah, so you can print to Google.
Jeff: Two reasons to exist, one was the
print server. I then messed up the, I can't get the printer back into the
Google print because I deleted it and I don't have a working computer to put it
in there, so aaaaahhhh, but I'll figure this out. And
the only other reason, the only other reason for the last year that I've used
that machine, was for you.
Leo: Oh wow. Well, don't get a new one.
Jeff: I was thinking maybe to go get a
mini.
Leo: The only reason I have a desktop
computer is so I can have big screen real estate. That's the only reason, and I
have at home on my desk, a thirty one inch monitor, and two twenty seven inch
monitors. That, you need a computer to do that. It
could be a laptop, I guess, but I have a Macbook.
Jeff: You can do a laptop. I've plugged
this...
Leo: But you're not saying, when you say
computer, you mean laptop or desktop, right?
Jeff: Yeah, yeah.
Leo: You're just thinking I don't need
to get anything to replace it.
Gina: You're getting rid of all local
storage, basically is what you're saying. You don't need local storage, like a
physical hard drive, right, Jeff?
Jeff: Right. So this is the show about
the cloud. I think I'm about to become...
Leo: Well, the cloud needs an endpoint
in your home. You can't just... You can't... You do have to have something at
home that attaches to the cloud.
Jeff: My Chromebook.
Leo: The cloud doesn't just flow into
your mind. So, Chromebook... I think Chromebooks... you have several pixels, thats enough, yeah. Why would you need anything more?
You don't edit video. You're not a photographer. You don't play games. If you
were a photographer you would not want a Chromebook.
Gina: This is the thing, this is the use
case, I think for regular folks or for someone like Jeff who primarily is a
writer, right? But like the photo thing is where I kind of
stop. And I know that you can pull out all your photos to Google+
photos, and I do that. I have my auto-backup on my phone now, but I have
gigabytes and gigabytes of photos that I took pre Google+, that I don't really
want to upload to the cloud, because I know to get them out, it would be a
multi gigabyte download and why wouldn't I just have the hard drive, myself.
But I get the argument for not maintaining your own, you know. I've got stack
of external drives at home, my archives of stuff, you know, before the cloud
ever happened. I don't know though, it just makes me nervous, like uploading
every single thing... Go ahead.
Jeff: I have never been organized, so I
don't have any of that.
Leo: But to be fair, you have a use case
that doesn't need a desktop computer. You don't have video, you're not a serious photographer, that's shooting camera raw.
Jeff: Serious photographer with a bunch
of volume, but the photo...
Leo: It’s not purely for storage, it’s
because of raw processing photo, you need Lightroom. You cannot do that on a Chromebook,
period. So there's certain things that you need to
have a computer for, but you don't do any of those things.
Jeff: I don't design.
Leo: And you're not alone, by the way.
Most people don't.
Jeff: So I'm thinking...
Leo: The kind of photography most people
do with their smartphone, it automatically uploads to Google+. Google+ gives
you all sorts of great features that for a normal person is plenty, most of my photography is done on Google+. I don't use Lightroom for a lot of it. So that makes sense, I'm just
trying to think of if there's anything that you might want to do.
Jeff: I can now do Microsoft word
documents for those luddites who still use it. And Chrome is not the greatest,
but...
Leo: I don't think you need a computer.
When you sat down at your Mac, what would you do? You'd use Skype, that's it. Nothing.
Jeff: It sit’s off in the corner or over
here, off camera, and the poor corpse and...
Leo: Get rid of it. Save some desk
space.
Jeff: I got my pixel, which as you know,
I adore. I'm thinking for trips, because they're so interchangeable, you know,
I might get the HP with - one of the new ones that has eight or ten hours of
battery.
Leo: I think that's a great idea. I
would like to get that Dell, but I think they've taken that off the market. For some reason. So we got the, for Michael, we got the Acer CZ 20. It’s two hundred
bucks, it’s little, it’s light. If you lose it, no big deal. And that's the best part about the cloud. You log into Jeff Jarvis@gmail.com
and now everything's there.
Jeff: I'm the same as I am anywhere.
Leo: Yeah.
Jeff: And so, yeah, the only thing about
the Pixel is it’s between five and six hours of battery, which, when I'm around
town is absolutely fine. No problem, I can go to the office and plug it in, I
come here and plug it in...
Leo: You don't game, you don't do
photography, you don't do video. There are a lot of
uses for a computer but none of them... You do not... I think you're a good
candidate, actually, to live in the cloud.
Gina: The whole idea scares the crap out
of me, but I think it’s great for you.
Leo: But you're a programmer, Gina.
You're not going to program in the cloud.
Gina: That's the thing, I can't do it because that's right. The software I spend most of my day in, is a tech starter with a bunch of plug ins, yeah.
Leo: I guess you could do that. I've seen...
Jeff: That could change too.
Gina: There are some web based editors, it’s
true.
Jeff: You're trying to argue.
Leo: I think you want to run your
debugger locally, on a local CPU...
Gina: Yes, I do.
Leo: I would feel... Look, programming
is hard enough. Here's my issue with Cloud, is if it makes anything at all
harder then I don't want to do it. It’s the same problem I have with using the
iPad as my main computer, yeah. You could do it, or your phone. You could do
it, but it’s just a little harder. Why would you make it a little harder.
Gina: Yeah, right.
Jeff: What I'm trying to say is
directionally, where this goes. That you wouldn't have ever stored all your
documents on this somewhere else, but it’s been offered for a long time. Apple
offered it ages ago, and it was awful and you didn't do it. But it’s fine, it’s now reached its usable critical mass.
Leo: You bet. It’s reliable enough, it
doesn't go down much. Furthermore, because we've gotten used to this idea
because we have multiple computers at work and home, maybe several at work and
several at home, what you want is the same data set up on everything. And the
cloud is the only way to solve that, so we...
Jeff: And as disorganized as I am, to be
able to synch... Before, I was awful at it. Terrible.
Gina: You probably have reams of documents
that you've produced over the years, Jeff. What do you do with those? Have you
just uploaded all of those to drive, at this point? Do you use Dropbox or...?
Jeff: I have boxes of clips in the
basement, which my wife hates from years and years and years and years ago. But
no, you know. Once my book is done, I don't care what the file is.
Leo: Can you, here's the question, I don't know the answer to. Could you take a large USB drive,
plug it into your Chromebook and download your entire
google drive onto it? Is local storage, can you do that, Gina, do you know?
Jeff: Yeah, you can do that.
Leo: You can? So why don't you do that?
Gina: And you can work offline, right,
there's offline support.
Jeff: YOu can
do that without USB.
Leo: But to save your stuff locally,
which I think is a good idea. Google's not going out of business, but why rely
on some third party corporation to store your stuff. You should have a local
drive. Or if you can do that, then that's fine.
Jeff: I could sync it to Dropbox.
Gina: Drop box, yeah.
Leo: And by the way, you know, we're
doing this in entertainment as well. Do you buy discs any more, do you rent
disks anymore? very much now, we stream everything. It’s
all in the cloud. You know, I don't want to buy or rent movies. I just get them
on demand. I mean, I do rent them, but I guess I don't want the disk. Aren't we
all moving in that direction? Because physical media is gone.
Gina: Or even just downloading the giant
file. Legitimately you're not. I got tired of that, I don't want to have to
download two gigabytes. I don't want to have to wait that long. I'll spend the
fifteen bucks on Google Play or wherever I need to buy, just get it right now
and not have to worry about it.
Leo: Same thing with music, we used to
have record collections. And every time you moved, the biggest pain in the ass, you box up these records, you move them. All of them,
you have them all, you don't even have to buy them now, any time you want you
listen to google music, and it’s all, twenty million songs. Your entire
collection is there.
Jeff: Right. That
entire bookshelf behind me. Now on the other hand, I went in to...
Sometimes my favorite is to go into the New York Times Time Machine and go to
old clips. I found a great one this week. I wrote about it on Medium. What
happened to newspaper illustrators when photography came? And it was right in
the moment of disruption. When Lincoln died the illustrators rushed on train
from New York to Washington to look at everything and sketch and draw and draw
their finals on the train on the way back to get them in. When Mckinley died, photographers existed and they didn't have
to exist. One daily newspaper had eighty five people in the art department,
many of them eliminated. Whereas the picture of what we have today, it was this
wonderful piece. In this process I found another book about fire and
electricity and, what was the third thing? But 1901 book about oh my god
technology. And it’s just so... Mirrors the thoughts we have today. I love it,
so I bought that good old book, and I like them. But the truth is, I can also, because it’s so old, I don't need it as a
book.
Leo: I kind of like having it as a book
though.
Jeff: But you're holding on to your
computer, the same way you're holding on to books.
Leo: I agree, I think you're right. I
think you're absolutely right.
Gina: I am sort of clinging to it, just
because I'm like, I need local... I need my hard drives, they make me feel better, but yeah. You're right, realistically I don't use them during the day.
Leo: It feels like what Jeff's doing is
a little risky.
Gina: It does, it feels like he's leaping
off a cliff. I'm trying to imagine just having a chromebook.
It would freak me out.
Jeff: That's what I wanted to raise it
today, yeah. to see what you thought, but I'm not
seeing a reason to go out and spend six hundred dollars, at minimum I can
buy... I'm not going to buy a windows machine, sorry Paul. Not doing it.
Leo: You'd be nuts to buy a windows
machine. You'd be insane.
Jeff: So the minimum purchase would be
$600 for...
Leo: Don't do it. You could even hook up
a big screen, if you want a big screen monitor and a typewriter keyboard, you
could hook it up to your chromebook or get a chromebook mini. Chromebox.
Jeff: But my keyboard is great, and I
don't need a mini... I mean, I can hook this up, it’s
hooked up right now to my monitor.
Leo: And the truth is, honestly, in the
chat room they're saying it’s very risky. In fact it's less risky, because
you're trusting the cloud provider to keep your data safe, and I think that it’s
mature enough now that thats a reasonable thing to
do. The only issue is privacy. The only issue is if you had stuff, nude
pictures... Of yourself... That you didn't want to
trust in the cloud because the NSA would pass them around
,because you're such a stud. Then you would want to keep those in some
local fashion that is not connected to the cloud.
Jeff: No, you want to encrypt them.
Leo: Or you can encrypt them. Wait a
minute, how are you encrypting them. You can't. You can't encrypt them, not
reliably. Because you no longer have your computer. The only way to do that reliably is to do that locally in a local CPU.
Jeff: Or I could email them to myself.
Leo: What do you do in Chromebook for encryption? Is there a plug in?
Gina: I don't know. Is there true...
Jeff: Email, yeah? You mean email? Or do
you mean...
Leo: Okay so if that's happening, then
Google has this new thing where there's some javascript that's doing the encryption. It’s possible to do public key crypt with javascript only.
Jeff: Well, the other thing...
Leo: It’s not exactly, 'Trust no one' in
that case.
Jeff: Back to the risk piece. I
accidentally screwed up. Pardon me, I'm writing this long boring thing now, and
I screwed up and erased five paragraphs I'd just written. And by god, Google
Versioning was there from last night, it was fine. Boom, one
button. And I was done and I was happy. So I never versioned my stuff
that way, and trying to get through Microsoft Word versioning was torture. It
never stored the version you wanted, it was awful.
Gina: Yeah the Docs stuff is really
great, it’s really great. In fact, today my co-workers pointed out, and I
actually think I missed this in the changelogs. I
think this was the week I was on vacation, but you can do suggested edit’s. You can either get somebody edit rites or you can
give them the right to comment, which actually turn into suggested edit’s, so they can inject. Yeah, it’s great, it’s
fantastic. It’s like, yeah this is the way this is
supposed to work. They really have. The versioning is awesome, and you all get
that for free. You never have to actually physically save your file. I mean it’s
great, it’s great modern software. So Jeff, what happens when your publisher
sends you some crazy word template that you have to use for your book, which is
what Wiley did to me. They sent me this like, crazy
word document with all these different templates and formatting and roundabout thingers, and I had to... I don't even remember what I had
to do, but I had to hunt down the right software to open it. I guess an author
of your caliber, would say screw you, I'm going to use
the template I want.
Jeff: Yeah I think so. It’s just words.
The thing that I'm writing now is probably about 50,000 word white paper on now
that you're freaking internet has ruined everything, Jarvis, what now? And it’s
all my thoughts on new relationships, new forums, and new models. And I put the
relationship off on new medium already. So there's now a Google add on, I can't
remember... Librio or something like that that will turn your Google docs into any
book, mostly in format. So I'd use that.
Leo: Chat room says I should just buy
you a computer and send it to you.
Jeff: But we're trying to be pure here.
Leo: I don't think you should. I don't
think what you're doing is risky in the least, in fact, let’s face it. It’s
much less risky. How many people have lost data on their home computer. Many. Many.
Jeff: Yeah. IOerror, IOerror, IOerror. That
would have been enough to put me into cardiac arrest a year ago. Now I just said, Oh crap.
Leo: A Band That Must Be Me says what if
Google locks your account? What are you going to do?
Gina: That's the big risk, that's the big
risk. That your account gets locked out.
Leo: It would be a good idea to have a
backup of some kind.
Jeff: I need to know how to sync to dropbox. I haven't... I'm sure it’s...
Leo: That's why I asked you, and this
would be the best way to do it if you can. Plug in a hard drive to a chromebook and say, "Google, give me all my data and
put it on the hard drive."
Jeff: That would be even better, but then
I didn't do it for a week which is what the case always was. I never backed up.
The thing with Drive is it does it automatically.
Leo: So that's interesting."
Gina: Did you do an IFTTT? Yeah, like, if
there's a new document in drive, then say get the dropbox.
Jeff: The problem is there, Gina, there's
a new document to drive every three characters.
Gina: Yeah.
Jeff: So what you'd probably want to do
is do it daily. Do an IFTTT.
Leo: That's fast enough...
Gina: It’s pretty good. I mean you know,
in this case you saved it last night and you deleted. I mean, that would still
have the... It’s drop box can save revisions?
Leo: Chat room. I need your help. We
want some way to sync all of your Google data in real time, constantly in the
background to some other servers. It could be Amazon, it could be Drop Box. Backupify used to kind of do this.
Jeff: Backupify did. Are they still alive?
Leo: They have been much constrained. I
know that they sent me a note saying, "We're not going to be
doing..." I think they've gone enterprise. But I wonder... Backupify for Google Apps. They do...
Jeff: The Apple time machine for the
home...
Leo: What you want is a time machine for
Google.
Jeff: You want a virtual time machine, a
cloud time machine.
Leo: This will do it every day, set it
and forget it with Backupify automatic. It’s only
three times a day, I think that's sufficient. Google Mail,
chat, drive, calendar, contact, and sites. It uses 256
encryption, up time. You actually answered our question, Jeff. Backupify.
Gina: Wow, everybody should do this,
regardless of their Chrome OS only. Hmm.
Leo: But this is for apps. This is not
for the public. You have to have the paid... And thats what happened, they went enterprise. They used
to do it, just... They do it for sales, for social media, and for Google Apps.
That is a great idea.
Jeff: That is, that is great.
Gina: It backs up to Backupify.
Leo: It needs to be consumer solution
for this.
Jeff: And that way you're just... It’s
not a lack of faith in Google, it just answers that question. It’s that
security blanket.
Leo: Google real time API. This is from
BB16 in our chatroom. There's an API, so you could, somebody could easily write
using the API. You'd have to give them your credentials. Gina. Why don't we do
this, you and I. We'll do this. We'll write this. I'm
a little python, you're a little rock and roll. It'll
be great.
Gina: Just give me username and password
to factor off credentials and we're good to go.
Leo: You'd need to give it access,
obviously. Alright, here's another one from CloudHQ.
This is great, chat room you're great for this kind of stuff. CloudHQ.net, how to synchronize google drive and dropbox. So this is a product, I guess, I gather,
that will do this. Huh. It will back it up to a variety of services.
Jeff: Because the idea is it just does it
for you, so you never think. It’s just like the essay I wrote about the death
of control less. I'm not saving that way anymore.
Leo: Yeah, right. Who needs that?
Jeff: So you want a backup that you don't
ever have to think about it, it’s just there. And the idea is that you're
paying for it for pure security, you may never look at it for five years, you
know.
Leo: So cloudHQ does this between a variety of things. Evernote, everybody, pretty much. This is really
interesting. Google Drive, GMail, DropBox,
Evernote, One Drive, One drive Pro, Sharepoint... Which means you could... WebDev would be great, because then you could go to somebody and say I want to set up
a WebDav server on Softlayer,
and then you'd own it and it would be your private thing and it would
automatically bank. Sugarsync, which is a backup
solution... Sugarsync might have a... Let me see if SugarSync has a Google Drive solution. So this is the only
safety net that I think I would say that if you had this, I would have no
problem Jeff.
Jeff: Right. Right.
Leo: none at all.
Jeff: And my presumption is that more and
more, we're going to go to Gig connectivity. And we're going to go to
absolutely costless storage and processing, within Cloud.
Leo: That's pretty obvious that thats going to happen.
Jeff: So then, your arguments about
photo, why?
Leo: No no no, there are certain things you need. A lot of local
storage and a lot of local CPU and among those are high, professional photo
editing of raw files. Video, no... I'm sorry... You're never... And the reason
is not the... Of course the cloud servers will have more power than your local CPU, it’s the transporting large amounts of data back and
forth that's required by this kind of stuff.
Jeff: OK, but if it’s a Gig line?
Leo: yeah, OK, maybe. I mean maybe, down
the road. It’s certainly not doable now. It doesn't make sense to do it now. It’s
not easy to do it now.
Jeff: I'm not saying that. I'm just
saying that...
Leo: Someday.
Jeff: We go there. There's WeVideo, you can edit video through the cloud. And the
difference in video is you actually get an advantage, because rendering locally
on a slower processor is hell.
Leo: I agree one hundred per cent, it’s the transport of the data that's prohibitive.
Jeff: The difference here is you
transport it once, and you render it every time on The Cloud. You may be better
off, than having to render slowly locally.
Leo: I understand that argument, try it
and you'll see why you don't want to do this.
Jeff: I know now, but again, I'm just
saying...
Leo: And someday everything will be the
size of a dot on your forehead and you won't have to even have a keyboard. But. For right now, I wouldn't recommend that. But the things
that you do, which is writing, writing is very small amount of data. That's
perfect.
Jeff: I used to work on a green screen
with a mono cursor.
Leo: i'm going
to talk to my buddy at Carbonite and ask him, why don't you do this... Because this would be a great product.
Jeff: It really would be such a consumer
product.
Leo: And there are a few, because CloudHQ looks like it does it. Personal plan is a hundred
bucks a year, they don't say how much data... But it
will synchronize Google Drive...
Jeff: HQ is not storing this stuff, it’s
just a transport.
Leo: It’s a synchronization, that's
right.
Jeff: It’s a transport so the data is not
that...
Leo: So you could say, have One Drive,
the Microsoft solution or DropBox and synchronize
them. That seems like a... I'm going to try doing this because increasingly
everything I do is on the cloud. The other thing you're giving up, is you don't... I mean... Desktop word is, I think, you
could argue better than the Google Word app, or...
Jeff: But I don't edit anymore. The only
time I ever have to edit at all, I don't care. All in word, I don't use it at
all. I write entirely in Drive now and I see advantages doing that. The
versioning is automatic, the saving is automatic. The functionality is easier.
I'm not doing fancy formatting, right, I'm writing text. In order for fancy formatting, I'd be doing
it in Quark or whatchamacallit. Indesign.
Leo: But you can't do that without a
desktop.
Jeff: But if I were doing... Print!
Print! Right, where are we now? We're in design separate from content.
Presentation is separate from content, that's what the web did. So what you
really care about, is your underlying data. Your content. And then design is a layer on top of that.
Leo: As you said, there's a point where
the phase change happens. Where you no longer use illustrators, suddenly you
use photographers. And we haven't quite come to that... I think we might be at
that point, maybe.
Jeff: We're at that point for me, and not
for video. We're at that point for writing, for transactions, for
communicating.
Leo: it’s happening very fast. I think a
lot of... Every time I said, two years ago, oh forget physical media. You will
no longer be buying DVDs or Blu Rays or... People
still yell at me when I say that, but it’s true.
Jeff: It’s true.
Leo: For all but the most audio file or
video file... People still like Blu Ray.
Jeff: I just want to know that I'm
living.
Leo: La Vida Cloudy.
Gina: You are. I mean, Jeff, you've been
kind of fixing to make this transition for a while. I think at this point, you
know, it makes sense for you to just drop the default assumptions that you have
to have a Mac. I would say, just don't' buy a Mac, and look worse comes to
worst, you need something, you need a Mac, you go to an office store and buy a Mac,
you know what I mean? See how long you go. I'd be interested to know how long
until... Yeah...
Jeff: My Osborne 1, with 64K... In 1981,
cost I think $3500.
Leo: Jeff, this is a momentous moment.
You have bought your last...
Jeff: it is. I think so. Here's the
question, Leo. Here's the question. What happens when you get pissy and you start cursing me coming in on Hangouts
instead...
Leo: Well, we have to live with that. Hangouts is going to get better, I hope. It'll get better, I
hope.
Gina: You're doing it for the show, Jeff.
I completely... You've gone totally...
Leo: We're okay, with... I mean he's on
Hangouts now, right?
Chad: The one issue we're having, on our
end, is that I think we need to upgrade our processor here. Because hangouts for some reason does not do... Yeah... And you can see it and this is my assumption here. I'll bring this back up
here. And this is what I assume is happening. Is that our processors are just
getting Macs right now. It’s because Hangouts... I don't know what is going on
there. But yeah.
Gina: oh wow. Yeah... They are pegs. Look at that.
Jeff: Jesus.
Chad: You can see that. So... I mean, that's... That was a very quick, you know. It
could be some other issue, but that was my quick diagnostic was that for some
reason Hangouts is using tons of CPU usage.
Jeff: The other issue is that I...
Leo: it may actually use all it can get ,so maybe...
Chad: Well, if it’s doing that, the frame
rate is really bad.
Leo: It’s still not great.
Chad: That's the next issue.
Jeff: The other problem I have, is that I paid for the fifty megs of Verizon's
service.
Leo: Gina's is only about fifty per
cent.
Jeff: Yeah, and they give me 25 so I've
got to call them. It was our conversation last week, I
have to take a breath and a day to go all... Say I'm paying you for this, I'm
giving you, I want to...
Leo: Tomorrow is my day off, it’s
Comcast day.
Gina: Oh, man. Comcast day...
Leo: Friday. Oh, Friday is my day off.
Chad: I used to do the same thing to
upgrade mine.
Jeff: So I have fifty... When they give
me what I pay for, I'll have fifty up, but fifty down.
Leo: Increasingly, my calendar, my to do list, my phonebook, this is all in the Cloud. I
have to say, this an actual... Now I'm going to have one day for going to the
DMV and one day for Comcast.
Chad: You want to go to the DMV together,
because I need to go to the DMV too.
Leo: Yeah, let's go to the DMV together.
It’s like saying, I've got to put aside a day for a root canal.
Chad: So we'll get breakfast, go to the
DMV and then get dinner. OK. Great!
Leo: I decided with Comcast, I'm going
to go to the store. I've decided that of all the options, phone, chat, store, I
think the store is the best. I've always had the best service in the store. Because you're actually looking at them.
Jeff: The other problem I've had, Leo, is
I've gone into the store, and...
Leo: I'm going to bring a box of
chocolates.
Jeff: They aren't the best at the whole
system sometimes, so they'll mess up something else in your account.
Leo: That can happen with anybody. My
experience in the store is they're usually pretty, the most competent.
Jeff: They're nice, and you have to face
them. And you're nice to them and you bring your box of chocolates, yeah.
Leo: I've had great results in the
store, so I think that's what I'm going to do is, going to, "Hey, I just
want to add turner classic movies, can you help me?" And then we'll see.
Should I record it?
Gina: Wear your Google Glass!
Leo: Hey, you know what, that's called
Defensive Google Glass. Where you don't use it, you just wear it. The threat that I might be recording this.
Gina: The observer effect. Using the observer effect on them.
Leo: You've got to think that Comcast,
particularly right now, they're very defensive. So if you start any Comcast
conversation with, "Do you mind if I record this?" You'll probably
get better service.
Jeff: I saw Craig Newmark the other day at an event here in New York, you know. Wonderful,
amazing, delightful Craig. He pulled out of his pocket, I hope I'm not telling this story out of turn... He watches TWiG.
He pulled out of his pocket a Verizon executive's business card, and he said, I just saw this person this morning. They're aware of you!
Leo: Oh dear! Oh dear, that could be a
mixed bag! Oh, dear!
Gina: That's awesome.
Jeff: And I have my next... They were
kind of like, "Oh, is that that the Nexus Seven? Is that the one that's
going to have to go to a museum?"
Gina: They're on the blacklist...
Leo: Normally we'd do news on this show.
There's actually a good amount of Google news but none of it really got us
excited. So what I'll just do is run down the headlines, and if either of you
have anything to say, just throw it in. How about that? And then we still want
to do the Changelog. Um... I
think we've decided no more computers for Jeff. When did you buy your first
personal computer, Jeff?
Jeff: My Osborne 1, in 1981.
Leo: So this is, you know what, it's
been 33 years. I think it’s time to stop. Stop the madness.
Jeff: Now, Leo, when was the last time...
I'll ask it this way first. When was the last time you did serious photo
editing?
Leo: I do it every day. Not every day,
but I do it frequently.
Jeff: You really do?
Leo: Yeah, the most recent one I put on
Plus, Lisa got her... No, so, Lisa... I posted to plus. Lisa got her 49ers Season
tickets, so I took photos with my five D, in camera raw, so these are forty,
thirty or forty megabyte files. Imported it into LightRoom,
processed it in Lightroom, uploaded it to Google and
posted it.
Jeff: It’s a wonderful photo, Leo, but
with all respect, would your phone have done that much of a different job with
those kinds of photos?
Leo: See, Jeff, this is why you can live
in the cloud, because you can't tell the difference.
Jeff: I'm saying if you're doing your
Hawaii landscape...
Leo: no, I'm telling you, Jeff. You
can't tell the difference, that's why you can live in the cloud. Believe me. My
phone cannot do this.
Jeff: Alright. That's what I'm asking. Alright. Gina?
Gina: It’s interesting, like I'm of two
minds. I think about this in the context of you know, what kind of computers is Etta going to use. How am I going to introduce my
daughter to computers. She's one, and I realize that
on one hand, I want to build a PC with her. I want her to understand how to
snap the ram onto the motherboard and I want her to know what it’s like to buy
a case and put a computer together, because I want her to understand what's
going on underneath. On the other hand, most likely, first of all, she's
already started to use my phone. So she's already been introduced to her
computer. She picks up my phone and goes like this, it means, "I want you
to start my app." Because she's got a little toddler lock app. On the
other hand I think I'm going to get her phones and tablets and chromebooks, right because...
Leo: She is never going to have a PC.
Gina: I don't think she's ever going to
have a PC.
Jeff: That's my point. That's my point,
Gina. But of course, Etta is going to come on... Jake was starting them at
three years old. The big moment in our family was when we thought that we had
to take Jake through living Mil Gross's magnificent living books. And he had to
do this form, he'd point at that and we'd click on it because his mouse was
really complicated. And my parents went up with him, so they didn't know. So he
just grabs the thing from them and starts doing it.
Gina: Right, he's like, here, let me show you how to do this.
Jeff: So Etta's going to be using things
and creating things, there's great... I forget what the name of it is. There's
a programming app for kids that's called Turtle something in tribute, as an homage to the old Turtle MIT stuff. It’s really wonderful
and there's great stuff... But she'll be creating and doing phenomenal things
without the need for this notion of, a computer is like saying, "Son
you really ought to know how a carburetor works." Why?
Gina: No, I know. I just... I learned a
lot of patience and I learned a lot about computers by building one myself. By
installing windows, you know, from scratch. By Googling what the hell is this
DLL, and how do I fix it... Editing... This is really old school stuff, but
this was like me figuring out... So part of me figuring that out is gaining the
confidence that I can fix anything that happens, that
comes my way, because I've fixed so many things to begin with. And I think,
like, so to give her a tablet or to say, "You've just got Chrome, right.
You've just got access to the web apps..." And if the web app is down or
you run into an error there's nothing you can do because that software isn't on
your...
Jeff: That's not what I'm saying. She
doesn't have to put in the motherboard, to know how to do that. I mean, listen,
I ordered a Heath Kit ham radio once. And my... Because I don't know how to fix a radio and put a new tube in... And things change.
Leo: No, in fact, what Etta's going to
need. She's going to need to know code, she's going to
need to know Python. She's going to need to know Rest APIs. That's the new
building a computer.
Gina; That's true. Rest APIs, that's true. That's true. Rest APIs is sort of the new...
Leo: She's going to need to know angular
JS and no touch JS, she's going to... those are the bit’s and pieces that are the Heathkit of the future. It’s
software, it’s not hardware. Hardware commoditized.
Gina: It’s a done deal. That I accept.
Leo: And that's fine. You know what, a
great thing, to teach her python and when she's six, hell yeah.
Jeff: It even goes back, Leo, full square to as old as we are. What did you do in the
original days of computing? You went to the lab and you got time on the main
frame. Now everybody has time on the main frame. As much time as they want.
Chad: I had already pulled on my
headphones because Jeff was talking to me, so I couldn't tell that you were
talking off mic, I thought you were talking on mic.
Leo: That lower third over light problem apparently... Yeah, I mean, you wouldn't teach a kid
how to build a crystal radio set. You wouldn't teach... I mean it might be fun,
and there is this whole 'make' movement that's really retro in many respects
and I don't have anything wrong with that. But really, if you're saying, from a
practical point of view what are the building blocks of the future... It’s
code.
Jeff: I ordered Gross's $200 or $300
printer, his printer. He has an amazing, really reduced price 3D printer. So
what's Etta going to do? Etta's going to be able to do CAD software to make
things, physically, in the 3D printer and make them fit together and do things
with them. And Jesus that beats Heath Codes.
Gina: That's fair, that's fare. Also
what's that project, that Google Project... project... The one with the snap, you know, the phone that snaps together the components. That's
similar to putting together a PC. Right? It’s just
smaller, and...
Jeff: The other thing, too, is we learn in
four ways. The story I was told about Jake and programming is that I thought
you had to learn those charts with the diamonds and the arrows and you have to
plan everything out because every developer says you got to know everything
before you do it. And what did he do? He showed them how to dig into a program,
tear it apart, put it back together, see how it works. Thats the way you learn.
Leo: Times change.
Gina: That's true. I accept that,
alright. Listen, don't buy a Mac. I want to see if you ever come to a place,
where you say okay, I have to give in.
Leo: I'm glad, Jeff, that you raised
this issue. Because I think you're absolutely right. I don't think... I think
the time has come.
Jeff: It occurred to me, it was a step
change in cloud world.
Leo: Now, I'm going to continue to buy
computers because of the stuff I do, I need a computer. But, I'm sure that time
will come for me, at some point, too.
Jeff: The problem is for then there go
half of your shows. Sorry.
Leo: No, that's fine. We'll move on, we'll
do more code.
Jeff: Yeah. Yeah.
Leo: Code is exciting. Frankly, I'd
prefer to talk about code. I think that's much more interesting. And it’s very
similar to...
Jeff: Back in the day, when I started
watching THaT, and you guys
would start launching into specs of a new monitor that's out, ooooooh. Right?
Leo: Well, you're not a computer
enthusiast.
Jeff: But I'm saying, even now, we don't
care anymore.
Leo: Some do.
Jeff: But not to the detail that we used
to.
Leo: You know it’s very much like stereo
equipment. Remember how in the... You're old enough, I'm old enough to remember where there were people who were just really into
stereo equipment. The fact that the music they were listening to was totally
secondary to the fact that they built the perfect stereo. And if they listen to
music it was the eighteen twelve overture, because the cannons and the bells
were really a good test of the subwoofers on their clich horns. And there were stereo magazines, how to build stereo. People talked
about total harmonic distortion... And RMS wattage. And it was, you know, then there came a time, and I think it happened in the
sixties when Rolling Stone came out, where the content became more important
than the hardware. And that happens over and over and over and over and over
and over.
Jeff: Let me put your point, though, in a
different way. My father was not a mechanic. I'll tell you this way. Confession moment. So for my sixth grade science fair, which
I won... I had built electronic bongos.
Leo: I love it! What does that mean,
what do they do? Tell me!
Jeff: It was little egg cups with metal
and you could tap them and it caused the amplifier to go bing bing bing, like a drum. But it was not a kit, it was
instructions and I built it and had the chart about why it worked this way and
all that kind of stuff. But I had to build the amp, or had to take an old radio
amp and put it in a new case and the speaker I had to build that. And the thing
was tilted every which way, it was as if designed by
Escher, right? And my father, this is this kind of a Howard Stern moment. My
father came down and said, "You're so clumsy you couldn't stick your
finger up your beep, with two hands!" It was. It explains a lot about me.
Leo: This reminds me of last week's
Masters of Sex. It’s all about the mean daddy. Did you watch it last week? One
of the best episodes of television I've ever seen.
Jeff: Really good.
Leo: Most of it takes place in a hotel
room. And the back drop is...
Jeff: I'm totally in love with her. Jeez.
Leo: Yeah, I've loved her from day one.
Yeah, she's gorgeous. Lizzy Caplan.
Jeff: Anyway so my father and I never
went and tore apart cars and did all that, right? But let’s say that you did.
Let's say you did.
Leo: Was he mechanical or no?
Jeff: He was an engineer by training, an
electrical engineer. So he wasn't a grease kind of engineer, physical. So Etta,
so let’s say that Etta enjoys physical engineering. She's not going to build a
Google self-driving car, because it’s too complex. It’s too delicate, it’s, you
know... You're not going to... Yeah, maybe you can plug in some things to it,
but these days with cars, lots of us run by computers, that
chance of really needing to run the thing is gone, Gina. You're right.
And there is something lost there, I'm not denying.
Gina: Mmmhmmm.
Jeff: But Etta's going to have so much
more fun!
Gina: She is. And I"m going to have a lot of fun doing it with her.
Leo: It just changes. And there's a guy
that said, "I didn't tune into this show to be less techy!" This is
not less techy, if you're a hardware fan, this is very
disruptive to you. And hardware doesn't go away, by the way. Hardware persists,
hardware has to. Servers and all of that, and there'll be plenty of people
building servers and all of that. But what happens is that the mainstream of technology moves
into software, and I think that that's been coming for a long time, and Gina, I
think you'll back this up. Software is where it’s at.
Gina: Yeah.
Jeff: Here is my prediction. Etta's
revolt is going to be that she goes to renaissance fairs and ends up carrying
nothing but technology and just plays the lute.
Leo: Mommy, I'm going to be making buggy
whips! It’s the future!
Gina: I'm going to be like, aren't you
excited! The FCC approved this GPS chip and I can just embed it under your skin
and we can always be in touch! No. I'll take my spiral notebook and a pen, and I"m good.
Jeff: Your generation... All of this
technology ruined the world!
Leo: I got to tell you that, though.
Neither of my kids is techno... They both use computers, but neither of them
are like geeky. And I wouldn't count on Etta being anything that you want her
to be, let’s put it that way.
Gina: Yeah... You're right. And certainly
the novelty of it isn't going to be there the way that it was for us. Right? Because it’s not new, right? I mean, it’s just going
to be around her, it’s going to be part of her life.
Leo: Well, I wish... You know, the
happiest day of my life was when Henry said, "Hey, can you teach me how to
hack?" And I said, "Great, we're going to start with Python and then
we're going to..." And he said, no no no. "I just want to get into
my grades and change them..." Well, you've got to learn code first... No,
no. I don't want to...
Jeff: My father loved going golfing. And
he tried to get me out to golf, I hated golf and it all ended once on the
driving range when I ended up pulling back my driver and hitting him in the
shin... Accidentally, I'll be very clear, because I'm clumsy. And then he ended
up hitting me in the head with a ball off a drive, and... No...
Leo: A good walk ruined! Alright. Here are the headlines. According to the cable
companies, it’s not the cable companies that threaten net neutrality, it’s
Google!
Jeff: Which is pretty
ridiculous.
Gina: This is classic reversal, but I
still don't understand what their argument was.
Leo: In a filing to the FCC, Time Warner
says the controversy over internet providers charging websites for access to
special fast lanes is a, "Red Herring", the real danger is that
Google or Netflix could demand payments from them! See they're living in the
cable world, which is exactly how that works, by the way.
Jeff: And they think that Google's going
to put up a paywall, to them. Which is absurd.
Leo: They're living in the past. They're
living in the days where you pay HBO to carry HBO on your cable
company and then charge the customer and that was how the financials all
worked. It’s not going to happen, because Google's not going to set a paywall.
No. I hope. No. Nooooo.
Jeff: It’s not their business model.
Leo: It’s really a very old fashioned
way of looking at things. This is, by the way, what's happened now with the
debate. I'm not sure exactly what to think, we were talking about it on
Security Now, the debate between level 3 and Verizon over who's causing the
congestion and Verizon says, "Well, it’s Netflix/Level3, their carrier's
fault, because you're pumping, it’s all asymmetric. You're pumping so much data
one way, and so it’s not really a peer relationship in the sense that we're
symmetrically sending data back and forth, so we want money from you because it’s
not." And that's how peering works. And I don't know what a good argument
against that is.
Jeff: Netflix just did a deal with
AT&T. Yeah, they're going to do deals, the cable
companies are, charging for service.
Leo: Google X has a new project to
collect anonymous genetic and molecular info... From people,
to help detect disease earlier. This is the Wall Street Journal.
Jeff: What interested me about this one
was, that Google XLab really is the closest thing we
have, I think, to Bell Labs.
Leo: You bet. It’s better.
Jeff: It’s not as big.
Leo: I think it’s better than Bell Labs.
Jeff: So that's what I want to talk
about. So how?
Leo: Bell Labs was very much focused on
AT&T, what technologies could make AT&T money. I think, always.
Jeff: They did pure research. Things that
they didn't know were going to have an impact on them.
Leo: Give me an example.
Jeff: There's even an argument that Unix wasn't going to be terribly useful to them.
Leo: Because Unix was probably one of the good... Bell Labs invented the transistor, they
invented Unix, they invented so much of the technology
that we use today. It seems like Google is going even farther afield. Google's
business has nothing to do with autonomous vehicles or the human body. This
reminds me of 23AndMe, in some ways. The baseline study will collect anonymous
genetic and molecular information from 175 people initially, later thousands
more, to create a picture of what a healthy human looks like. It’s being led by
a fifty year old molecular biologist named Andrew Conrad. He joined Google in
March of 2013. Seventy to a hundred experts. I think
this is a very... And Serge is very open to the idea of putting money into the
public wheel.
Jeff: But it's also smaller, but the
question... I live near the old Bell Labs, and it’s one of two major
facilities, and it’s phenomenal. It’s huge, and the parking lot is just empty
now. And it’s quite sad, because so much happened there. It was phenomenal.
Does Google+ have to be as big as Bell Labs, do you
need as many scientists to do things? Is it more distributed, you know? If
Google is our most successful technology company as AT&T was at the time,
and they're doing this for the future, which I think they are... Is Google X
big enough?
Leo: Yeah.
Jeff: Some people complain it’s too big, they're doing too much crazy stuff. But maybe they're
not doing enough, I don't know.
Leo: 1957, maybe you saw this in school, Hemo the Magnificent.This is from Bell Labs. You wouldn't see this in school today. They're quoting
Leviticus. This is 1957. I guess they did a series of educational videos. So
that doesn't help AT&T.
Jeff: They did a lot of stuff like that.
Don't you love it when they... Yeah...
Leo: Wow.
Jeff: When they rolled the projector into
class, weren't you happy?
Leo: Oh, they had major hollywood movie stars in there.
Yes, love the movies.
(Playing
a video...)
Leo: This was like a real Hollywood
movie.
Jeff: What's his name, the guy on the
right?
Leo: A great character actor, I can't
remember.
(Still watching a video - Hemo the Magnificent.)
Jeff: This was entertaining to us, Gina.
Leo: Yeah.
Jeff: Well, actually just not having to
do classwork was entertaining.
Leo: I think we could watch TV. Yeah, I
think he was the voice of Winnie the Pooh. But I'm trying to place his name...
The chatroom won't tell us. And who's that guy? He's a movie star. Magic
screen! It’s in the cloud!
(Still playing the video.)
Leo: Well, that's Mel Blanc. So they
really... This is big bucks, and you can, I think you can safely say that this
is not a money maker for AT&T.
Gina: I don't understand... This is an
educational video about blood?
Leo: About blood. There was a whole
series of these, there are quite a few of them. Wow.
Gina: So you know, Google doing this...
Leo: Holloway, is that right? Is that who that is?
Jeff: Maybe?
Gina: I read this article about Google
doing this and I think, why is Google doing this? Why
isn't a medical... I know that Larry and Sergey are
particularly obsessed with health issues, because I forget which one of them
has the predictor gene for some disease. I forget which but... I don't know.
And I think that their intentions are good and of course the data is being
collected, I'm not mislead in all that. But I just
wonder, it just seems like, whenever they do projects like this that involve
massive amounts of data collection and of course data analysis and data
collection is what Google is good at, but there's always that question about
what are they doing with it, and there are privacy concerns. And I know, Jeff,
there shouldn't be, but there are. And it makes me worry that they're going to
do more harm, than good. You know? Like, because the headline is, "Why is
Google... Indexing your DNA?" Right?
Leo: In fact, the MIT technology review
and Tony Regulator writing says Google X's project to study human health.
That's no Apollo 11, it’s a secret lab. He really poo poos
this. It isn't a moon shot, I mean, come on. I don't know. It seems
like... I mean, we can be...
Jeff: But I think Gina has a really
important point here, but I believe that these guys really mean that health
data should be open for the good of all. It’s a cause for them. And you're
right, Gina, there's a risk that if they mess this up, then they ruin their own
cause. But if they do it right, we are limiting the knowledge that we have.
We're losing lives because we don't know enough.
Gina: Is Google the best organization to
do this? I guess is my question. I wonder if Google is the right...
Leo: Well, okay, so there's an
interesting argument here. You remember the human genome project, the project
to map the genome. There were public sector scientists working on this, and
there were corporate people working on it and it was the corporate people who solved
it very quickly. Very much quicker than anybody thought. And I think that at that point it opened people's eyes that this could be done
in the private sector, and that of course there was some incentive to map the
genome because maybe you could patent it. There is a project that's been going
on for considerably longer, the Personal Genome Project. I tried to get in on
this. Esther Dyson is one of the people who has donated her data to this, this is from Harvard so this is public sector. And
they've collected, I think, both the genome and the medical information for
something like a hundred people. Or this was the plan. And the whole deal with
this, and the reason was very difficult and I asked to participate and have
not been invited, is because you have to be willing to give... There's no
privacy involved. In order for this to work, you had to consent that your name
would be... They said, "We are not going to be able to keep this private
so your name will be known. Your phenotype, your genotype, everything will be
public. Researchers will have access to it, and there you go." And because
you can't keep this private, if you're going to participate you should
understand that.
Jeff: I was talking to Esther Dyson about
this issue, once and I said, well, I suppose Ester that if I'm talking about my
prostate cancer and I reveal something about my son's genome. And she says,
"Oh, Jarvis, get over it. Everyone gets prostate
cancer."
Leo: It’s true, eventually. George
Church is doing this, and we talked to George on our show Futures in Biotech, some years ago.
And I tried to get in on this and I think it’s a great thing, and I just don't
know if, you know if you sign up you agree to pay for the tests, which are
several thousand dollars and I wanted to do it because I felt like this would
be a contribution. But you have to do extensive medical questionnaires, because
they're trying to match your genotype with your history. It’s great. And this
is totally for the public good. And I think somewhat similar to what Google is
up to.
Jeff: I went to the privacy event of the
All Hands Privacy event at Google about two or three months ago, and a guy, I
think his name is MIkey Nickerson, he's an engineer at Google. The chat room maybe will know and I'm maybe getting
his name wrong. But he was the guy who went off to rescue Obamacare technology,
with a few others. But he was the main guy, and he came back and he gave a
really eloquent wonderful talk about having a lack of knowledge, what a lack of
knowledge has done through history of health. Right? And the classic example is Steven Johnson's retelling of, what was it, Typhoid?
Gina: Yeah, the water...
Jeff: The one well...
Gina: The tainted water, yeah.
Jeff: The tainted water, right. It was
knowledge that cured that. It’s data that cures that. And keeping that data
private, you know, still seems illness is something to be ashamed of. Punished by society, so that people do hide it. It’s only
going to hurt us. And yes, if you have ebola, there's
a reason that we want to keep you off and keep you separately, and the family
didn't have to have it affect them and that's not good for society either, and
I understand that there are always going to be strictures about health
information. But in general, more information is good full stop. You could
misuse it, about privacy, you could misuse it in bad
science. But, to chose to have less information is
insane. So I think this makes sense of Google, but who was better to gather and
analyze large amounts of data, at a consumer level? And you know, who's better at it than their level? The NSA, but I don't want them to have it.
Leo: But then there are people who
equate Google with the NSA, just a private sector version of the NSA. Alright,
lets... There's good conversation. We can talk so much more about all of this
stuff, but I think it’s time to play the drums, play the trumpets, play the horns. Put Gina Trapani to work, because it’s time
for the Google Changelog. What's new with the Goog. Gina has the latest.
Gina: Google maps got a pretty big
update, our new feature... IOS and Android, it’s the new explore feature! I
don't know if you've gotten this already, on your phone, Leo. So you launch
google Maps on your phone and there's a brand new button on the bottom right
and it’s the Explore Nearby button. And you tap that, and Google looks at the
time of day, and the weather and your location and then basically just
recommends what's the nearest best thing. Kind of nearby. Very similar to Foursquare. Clearly
using Saget, clearly using your social connections. It'll tell you from your circles who has gone places
or rated things, um. It’s pretty nice, so the new feature expands Google Maps,
as more than just kind of a directions app. It'll make suggestions for you and
inject them based on context.
Leo: I do have it! So it’s next to the bullseye that says pinpoint where I am. There's a new
button, that has a little pin dropped into a circle, and if I tap that, it
says, "Here's what's near you within a ten minute walk." It says, it’s
the afternoon, it’s 88 degrees. Here's some quick bites, Mary's Pizza Shack. There's some
parks, here's ice cream, tea houses... Bakeries. They
think I'm a fatso! Where's the nearest gym? Here's some Zagat's stuff. I'm glad
to see Zagat's... It’s on the maps, so I get...
Gina: Literally it’s a new button right
on the interface.
Jeff: It’s not Google Now, I see.
Leo: it’s right on the interface. But it
is kind of now ish, isn't it?
Gina: It is kind of Now-ish. I was saying on All About Android last night, it is great. I would normally use Foursquare for this kind
of thing, but I went to explore…near my office. My office is in kind of an industrial area in
Brooklyn, and there’s not a lot of lunch options. And it actually found a place that I hadn’t
heard of before—
Leo: That’s awesome.
Gina: —that I wound up saying,
“Oh, I’m going to check this out, so it’s pretty good. Lots of images, lots of
ratings.
Jeff: Wow.
Gina: Takes into consideration
open/closed times. I believe it does not
recommend places that are not open at the moment that you’re checking. So it’s pretty good.
Leo: Wow. This is sweet.
Jeff: You know my favorite
thing that Google does to me now?
Leo: What?
Jeff: On Saturdays, only on
Saturdays, in my Google Now it tells me how long it takes to get to Bridgewater
Commons. And the reason is is because on Saturdays I go to Chipotle there.
Leo: (Laughter)
Gina: (Laughter)
Jeff: And it knows that I’m
going to Chipotle, so 17 minutes to Bridgewater commons. Yeah, okay. It’s time for a burrito. It knows
when to do it. It knows when I’m
there. Of course, Germans would find
that freaky. I don’t. I find that amusing.
Leo: I was actually
thinking. I’ve talked with Mike Elgan and others about the Android Wear Watch, and if
there’s a negative to the Android Wear Watch, it doesn’t do enough of that.
Jeff: Enough. I agree; I agree.
Leo: I want more Google Now,
not less Google Now. In fact, that would
be—I mean, I guess you’ve got to constrain screen. You can’t just load it up with stuff, but I
really like this new maps feature. I
love it.
Jeff: Yeah, that’s great.
Gina: I mean, it could be like
oh, I see it looks like you pick up coffee most mornings at 9 a.m.—
Leo: Right.
Gina: —at this place. Have you tried this other place down the block? Your friend, Jason likes this place or
something like that.
Leo: Oh, look! We’re on it. We’re here. We’re a popular
attraction in the Play & See section.
Jeff: (Laughter)
Leo: TWiT LLC.
Gina: Nice!
Jeff: No way.
Leo: Yea! Well, there’s not that much stuff within five
minutes, so I guess that’s probably—
Gina: I like it. Popular attractions.
Leo: Yea!
Jeff: Have you guys played—is
the new Foursquare out? Because they did the split off of the
check-in as a separate—
Leo: I use Swarm, which is
the check-in part.
Jeff: The check-in thing.
Gina: Mm-hmm.
Jeff: Is the new core Foursquare out yet?
Gina: I don’t think so. I haven’t gotten the update.
Jeff: Okay, so they‘re going
to redo that at the same time?
Leo: Right.
Gina: Mm-hmm.
Jeff: Because that’s where
Foursquare and Google are going to compete again.
Leo: Right.
Gina: Yeah, yeah.
Leo: I don’t know. Google, I mean they own Zagat. Boy, I mean, they really—the have Google
Places, so they have all those businesses.
Jeff: They know where you
go. To me, the huge trove of data that’s
just waiting is they know which restaurants they go to.
Leo: Right.
Jeff: They know how many
people of what type go to what restaurants.
Leo: Google’s been fairly
judicious. They obviously don’t want to
go too far down that…
Jeff: But Google also knows
gee, Mr. Laporte stopped for 12 minutes at this address. That’s a gas station. Hmm, everybody seems to be going to that gas
station. I wonder what the price is? There’s more data
to play with there, that’s phenomenal.
Leo: Yeah, yeah.
Gina: So you’re talking about
the passive tracking of your phone’s location. So Leo’s not checking in at that gas station. Right?
Leo: It just knows where I am.
Jeff: Boom, exactly.
Leo: Yea.
Jeff: Which is what Foursquare tried—that Dennis Crowley tried to get to by
having people sign up for the app and just do it, but he was still stuck with
the check-in motif and wants to break out of that.
Gina: Yeah. Yeah, you’re right. Yeah, so explore there in maps. You’re right. Now it’s interesting. I hadn’t
really thought about Google Now, but I guess Google Now does do that,
right? You don’t necessarily check in at
Chipotle every Saturday, but Google Now says, “Hey, it’s Saturday. Are you headed to this place?”
Jeff: You hobgoblin of habit.
Leo: Yeah. Mm-hmm.
Gina: Mm-hmm, mm-hmm. Yep. What else do we have? Oh, Google Voice. Google Voice is now offering Web-based calls
through Hangouts, no Google + profile needed. So this is a little bit of a minor new feature, but if you use Google
Voice, it might come in handy. So now,
this means just Google Voice on the Web. If you go to Google Voice on the Web, if you search for a user, and you
click on the call button, you can choose which phone to call for that contact
and under that choice, hangouts is now a new option. So you can call the person through Hangouts
and you don’t have to have a Google+ profile set up in order to use that. So a little, tiny, minor
move toward integrating Voice and Hangouts. I want to see more of that. I want to see Voice and Hangouts merge
completely at some point. Gmail for iOS
is getting the update that Android’s had I believe for a while now—not for a
while, but a few weeks. Gmail for iOS
just got insert from drive and save to drive. That update released this past week, and just like with Gmail on the
Web, that means that iOS users can now insert files directly from Google Drive
into emails and save attachments from emails into Google Drive. If the recipient of the email that you’re
sending doesn’t have access to the Google Drive document, you can send them,
Gmail for iOS for inform you, and then you can change the sharing settings for
sending it, and that update is rolling out now. I think it came out this week. Google Translate has added crowdsourcing features to improve its
translations. I’ve got to say, I mean,
crowdsourcing works really well in a lot of situations. Translations particularly well. So Google established the Google Translation
Community, which is open now, open to everyone. That gives users who speak more than one language fluently the option to
offer their own translations and valid current translations. So if you are bilingual or multilingual, you
should go to translate.Google.com/community. You can tell Google what languages you speak, and then if you click on
the get started button, Google will just show you a phrase and say, “Here’s a
phrase in English. How would you
translate this in another language?” The
more people who do this, the better translations will get. I think that Google will also show you
current translations that it has and let you correct them or update them.
Leo: Is that an
acknowledgment that machine translations just is never
going to get as good as human?
Jeff: Exactly.
Gina: Yeah, yeah.
Leo: (Laughter)
Gina: (Laughter) Definitely.
Leo: Because given Google’s
inclinations, it probably would like the machine to do it all.
Gina: Yeah, yeah. I mean, even with Android apps, when I
localize my app into a few different languages, there’s just things that
are—there are different translations, and you want a human looking at them. And even Google, they’d added the developer
console for Android apps that you could basically sign up for a service that
had actual humans reviewing your translation, so they have conceded that
machine translations don’t work completely.
Leo: Yeah, yeah. Well, we’ve all known that, but…
Gina: We’ve known that, right?
Leo: Yeah.
Gina: Language is just a
little too hard.
Leo: It’s hard.
Gina: Finally, chrome beta for
Android, which is actually my default browser—and it’s been great for me so I
recommend it—got the material design makeover or a material design makeover. Ars Technica has a nice rundown of the changes. The changes are subtle but also very
nice. Just kind of open, flatter, wider,
just much more sort of material design-y than you think. A little simplicity, fewer lines, more
space. The logo got a little bit
punching up, a little more colorful. A
couple of things are broken because it is a beta. I think the numbers don’t show up on your
tabs button anymore. They’ve combined
the address bar and the search bar in some contexts. Incognito mode, the new tab is completely
black and has got a new icon, which is really kind of neat. Yeah, so really nice update
there. I’ve been running the
Chrome beta. Like I said, it’s my
default browser, and I really like it. I
like it a lot. So the material design
makeover for Chrome hasn’t been completed yet. I think it’s still a work in progress, but it’s kind of neat to see
material design rolling out to Chrome and to the Play Store and to the kind of
proprietary Google apps before Android L drops. And that’s all I’ve got.
Leo: And that’s the Google Changelog. Boy, it‘s
really depressing when you go to volunteer to help with Google Translate and it
says, “Select the languages you know.”
Jeff: (Laughter)
Gina: (Laughter) And you’re like, “Ohh.”
Leo: None of those.
Jeff: Bunch of terrible
Americans.
Leo: Oh, we’re terrible. Look at all the languages I could know, but
don’t.
Gina: I had to fake it and say
Italian, even though that was totally not true.
Leo: (Laughter)
Jeff: I would say I speak 1.1.
Leo: Speak fluently. Wouldn’t you like to be one of those people
that has—but it won’t let me check more than five.
Gina: (Laughter)
Jeff: (Laughter)
Leo: Why limit me? I can speak so many languages fluently.
Gina: Is Klingon listed there?
Leo: Yeah, probably. Let me see. That’s a good question.
Gina: (Laughter)
Leo: No, they’re not looking
for Klingon translation, sorry. They
also had like Leetspeak, but none of those in here.
Gina: (Laughter)
Leo: These are actual
languages. Cherokee. That’s interesting. Chichewa, Igbo, Telugu.
Jeff: (Laughter)
Gina: (Laughter)
Leo: (Laughter) No, I’m just saying
nonsense words. I’m sorry.
Gina: There’s a lot of languages.
Leo: There’s a lot of
languages.
Gina: A lot of them with us.
Leo: Right to be
forgotten. Let’s give Jeff a chance once
again (laughter).
Jeff: (Groaning)
Leo: There’s so many—I don’t
even know what to say. Fifty percent
now—
Jeff: Stupider, stupider, and
stupider.
Leo: Stupider and stupider.
Jeff: A new frontier in Spain.
Leo: What’s going on in
Spain?
Jeff: Spain has passed a law
that requires payment to link.
Leo: What?
Jeff: It’s called the Google
tax and it’s a required payment to link, and then they’re going to give the
money to big old media companies to save them. It is just beyond—it even goes beyond the rest of Europe.
Leo: So what is Google going
to do? I mean, they‘re not going to pay
people to put links in Google search results.
Jeff: Of course not. Of course not and I think as boing-boing
pointed out that even if you’re a small blogger you can’t opt out because it’s
now considered like a human right in the bill. I don’t think it’s gone all the way through. Ridiculously stupid. And now I understand why Google wants me to
come over and speak. And full
disclosure, they pay for my airfare because I’m not going to lose money on
this, but they don’t pay me. At a Big
Ten event in Madrid, and now I know why they want me to come to Madrid.
Leo: Good, yeah. You idiots! (Laughter)
Jeff: Because geez.
Leo: How do you say idiot in
Spanish?
Jeff: Yeah, how do you? Chatroom? If we were fluent in five languages, we’d
know that.
Leo: We’d know.
Jeff: So there’s that, but
there’s a ray of hope this week. The Lords,
The House of Lords in the U.K. has said that right to be forgotten is undoable
and stupid.
Leo: Good. The Lords know. It’s the commons that—
Jeff: Meanwhile, the Google
Advisory Committee is going to hold a bunch of basically public hearings, and
they’ve invited people to send them their views. It’s as if the advisory committee is kind of
a foe FCC now on this.
Leo: Geez Louise. I think they should have open hearings. They should let you watch the sausage being
made and then it would become very obvious very quickly how untenable this is.
Jeff: Yeah.
Leo: Fifty percent of all the
requests, over 100,000 links from 91,000 people have been granted so far.
Jeff: And there’s a list of
questions that Google and Bing and Yahoo were called on the carpet shay
woodshed about their implementation because they weren’t happy that Google was
notifying that they’d be delinked because the media would just write stories
about that. So there’s this list of
questions of what they demanded of them, and it’s just—again, it continues the
tremendous idiocy of this.
Leo: What information do you
request from a data subject prior to considering a deleting request? Do you filter out some requests based on the
location, nationality, or place of residence. Do you delete results—
Jeff: Data subject. It makes it sound like serfs.
Leo: Ughh. What explanation do you provide to data
subjects when you refuse to delist? Well, we said not to (laughter).
Gina: (Laughter)
Leo: This is … God.
Gina: Hyperlinked.
Leo: This is like—I guess it’s
a jobs project for the EU. Like Google’s going to have to hire thousands of people for this.
Jeff: In both places, it’s war against the link, and the link is the fundamental
architecture of the Web.
Leo: Yeah. No, it’s a war against the Web. It is.
Gina: Mm-hmm.
Jeff: The link is subversive,
and government has finally figured that out. They’re trying to subvert the subversion of the link, and let’s hope
they fail, folks.
Leo: Google has made another
big acquisition. According to sources,
Venture Beat and other reporting, Google has paid $1 billion to buy Twitch.tv,
the Justin.tv spinoff that allows you to watch live game streaming, sources
familiar with the matter told Dean Takahashi. A billion!
Gina: $1 billion.
Jeff: Jesus.
Leo: And you know what? I don’t think anybody’s saying it’s not worth
it. That’s certainly the number one
thing to watch on YouTube right now is game play, right? PewDiePie and
others, people love it. I watch
Michael. He’s 11 years old. That’s pretty much all the television he
watches is YouTube videos of game play. That’s it. It’s big money
here. This is the future. Both Google and Twitch declining comment at
this point. They bought YouTube for 1.65
billion, so wow.
Gina: Wow.
Leo: $1 billion. Twitch has 50 million—it’s not that big—50 million monthly active users, more than a
million members who broadcast videos each month, but that’s big growth. They’ve grown considerably over the last
couple of years. They also distribute
shows from people like CBS Interactives, GameSpot, Joystick, and Destructoid,
which are gaming news sites. Thirteen
billion minutes of video are watched every month on Twitch.
Jeff: I said it the last time
we talked about this. I don’t get it.
Leo: Well, you’re old.
Jeff: I’m old; I’m old; I’m
old.
Gina: Yeah,
I’m old. This just makes me feel old.
Leo: And you’re not a gamer.
Gina: Yeah.
Leo: We interviewed on
triangulation this week on Monday the first really successful gamer, Dennis
Fong. His handle was Thresh. In ’97, he won the tournament to be the best
Quake player in the world. He got a John Carmack’s red Ferrari as a prize. He pointed out that now these tournaments
have prize purses in the millions, tens of millions. And these tournaments really make their money
by broadcasting the game play of the tournament and then having big events and
so forth. So what was it? League of Legends
Tournament? What was the
tournament that—
Chad: Yeah, League of Legends.
Leo: So it’s pretty
impressive, I have to say. It’s become
big business, but it’s not for you and me.
Jeff: I guess I should
celebrate that entertainment becomes interactive and people are more involved.
Leo: You should watch. Some of these are very exciting. Some of these videos are very exciting.
Jeff: See, I can’t play them
in the first place. I’m not a game
player at all.
Leo: Well, that’s why you
don’t need a computer (laughter).
Jeff: (Laughter)
Gina: No, but you can watch
Twitch on your Chrome OS (laughter).
Leo: You can.
Jeff: Yeah.
Leo: You can.
Gina: You need to have some
context, right? It’s only exciting if
you have some context.
Jeff: What’s going on right
now on Twitch?
Gina: Like what’s this game
about? What’s the point?
Leo: You want to watch some
Twitch video right now? Was it this show
or was it TWiT that we showed the Pokemon Red Victory?
Jeff: We did on this show?
Leo: That was on this show,
so you’ve already seen some.
Chad: And it’s not really all
that much about the game. It’s about
who’s streaming—
Leo: It’s the personalities
of the people who are commenting.
Chad: Yes, absolutely.
Gina: Oh, it is? Okay.
Leo: Well, it’s a mix. Michael watches a lot of these to learn
techniques and stuff.
Chad: Like right now I
think—what time is it? No, he’s
stopped. There’s a few streamers that I tune into just to watch their streams.
Leo: Really? Because of what they say because they’re
funny?
Chad: Right. They’re great people to hang out.
Leo: So a thousand people
watch this guy playing. You’re saying I
shouldn’t do this?
Chad: Well, no. They’re fine.
Leo: Because there’s usually
profanity, right?
Chad: Absolutely. And then also you went into an area that is
probably the least appropriate.
Leo: Now look at what he’s
doing. He’s on a green screen I would
guess. And there’s him and in the
background is his screen. So this is a
fairly sophisticated setup. Where should
I go? Games, channels? Right?
Chad: No, no. Games is perfect and
they’re rated by most viewed. So right
now, League of Legends is on top.
Leo: Yeah, it’s boring to
watch League of Legions.
Chad: Sure, absolutely. So go watch Minecraft.
Leo: All right. Minecraft. That’s fascinating.
Chad: Right. That’s number six.
Leo: Pfffpt!
Jeff: (Laughter)
Chad: Who’s up there on the
top?
Leo: MadPack. He’s got the John Bam’s wild. Dfield Mark,
Beast Machine 911, Chaoschunk, any of those ring a bell?
Chad: No, none of these guys.
Leo: Look, this guy’s got
1,500 viewers. Oh, this is for mature
audiences.
Chad: Yeah, so they’ll let you
know that too.
Leo: I’m surprised people are
playing Plague Inc. on here. That’s not
exactly an action game. We’re going to
start watching. I might warn you there
may be fleeting expletives. This is a
tablet-based game.
Chad: Well, Plague is now a PC
game.
Leo: Yeah, you can play it on
any platform, but it came out a tablet and it’s really a touch game where
you’re trying to conquer the world with your plague. So you design your plague, adding
capabilities as you go. It’s not exactly,
as you can see, an action game. So you’re saying it’s this guy that makes it
interesting.
Chad: Yeah, it doesn’t
matter. In order for these people—
Leo: I feel like I missed a
bet.
Chad: There’s a guy named
Bacon Donut, and every night he has 7,000 people tuning in to watch his stream
where he plays games.
Leo: If I search for Bacon
Donut, can I watch one of is videos?
Chad: Yeah, he probably has
stuff archived.
Leo: All right
(laughter). Making
bacon donuts.
Gina: Making bacon donuts.
Chad: Or Sevadus is another big guy.
Leo: See, Chad knows all
about this because he’s under 30.
Chad: (Laughter) And he streams
seven days a week for four hours, five hours.
Leo: Does he make money on
this?
Chad: Absolutely.
Leo: Bacon Donut is the
tastiest. How does he make money on
this?
Gina: Yeah, how does he make
money?
Chad: Donations are a big ploy.
Leo: So people give him
money.
Chad: Yeah, and so what
they’ll do is they’ll have a ticker that shows the latest donations, the top
donation of the night, the top donation of the week.
Leo: I bet you Michael’s
watching Bacon Donut.
Chad: See? There’s Bacon Donut.
Leo: He looks like a Bacon
Donut. He’s on a green screen?
Chad: Yeah. Some people choose green screen. Some people choose face cam box.
Leo: Right. I like the green screen. You really look like you’re—although putting
your head in the lower—well, anyway. So
let’s listen. What’s going on here?
Chad: You have it muted, so we
can’t.
Leo: I have it muted?
Chad: Yeah.
Leo: Well, let’s unmute
it. Let’s listen to all the Twitch glory.
Male Voice: What’s the
record? Our record’s two hours and 30
minutes. Right now it’s about an hour an
eight minutes.
Leo: He’s doing a speed run.
Male Voice: And we’ll
increase it by an hour.
Leo: So he’s got somebody
narrating because he’s obviously busy.
Chad: He’s actually in a call
with someone. That’s not Bacon. Sorry.
Leo: Oh, that’s not Bacon
Donut. One of the things that I find
less interesting in this is the expression on people’s faces when they’re
playing video games is pretty much that of an unconscious zombie.
Gina: (Laughter) It’s true.
Leo: There’s no affect. There’s no smiling. There’s no laughing. They don’t look like they’re having fun.
Jeff: It’s true.
Gina: it’s true.
Chad: As you can see at the
top of his video, top this month, top today, most recent.
Leo: There you go. He’s laughing now.
Jeff: I was about to say I
hope my surgeon has this much concentration. Of course, after you die, he laughs.
Leo: (Laughter)
Jeff: I take it back.
Leo: Anyway, there you
go. That’s an example, and he’s making a
living doing this. Oh, it’s five bucks
to subscribe.
Gina: Also, I just feel like
it seems like watching someone else control a first person—like watching
someone else game is like I don’t know.
Leo: It’s even more passive
than playing.
Gina: Yeah, but no. I mean, the movement of the camera, it’s just
very—
Leo: Oh, yeah. Makes you queasy.
Gina: It’s disorienting.
Leo: We’re just old.
Gina: Yeah.
Leo: We’re all too old for
this.
Gina: (Laughter) Clearly.
Leo: I missed a bet. I really think I could have done a good job
at this had I been a little younger. I
think I‘m funnier than a lot of these guys. I could have done a good narration as I play the game. I blew it. I could be making millions now instead of sitting here talking about
Google.
Gina: (Laughter)
Jeff: On your table with lines
in it.
Leo: Yeah, I’ve got to get a new
table, and can I afford it? No, Bacon
Pancakes is taking all the air out of the room.
Jeff: (Laughter)
Leo: Google offering three
months of free unlimited music to celebrate one year of Chromecast. You’ve got to buy a Chromecast to get it. Chromecast has been now used 400 million times to
cast sessions to TVs. Are they counting?
Jeff: I guess. A kind of meaningless stat.
Gina: Oh, yeah. They definitely are.
Leo: It seems like that’s a
small number, 400 million.
Gina: Four hundred million casts, and they sold how many million Chromecasts?
Leo: Okay.
Gina: Four hundred per device?
Leo: Okay.
Jeff: Okay, yeah, yeah.
Leo: Services like YouTube,
let’s see. People are Chromecasting. All
they say is they’ve sold millions in 20 countries, millions.
Gina: Oh, they’ve sold
millions. I’m sorry. So it’s not one million. Okay. Okay.
Leo: Millions. We don’t know what that is. We don’t know what millions means. Could be
anywhere from one to nine.
Gina: Yeah, right. So even if it’s 2 million or 3 million—
Leo: It’s probably in that
ballpark.
Gina: We’re talking about 200
casts per device. That’s good. That’s active use.
Leo: That is active use, and
I would say most people who have a Chromecast use it
fairly actively, yeah?
Jeff: When I finally got a
smart TV where I watch TV most of the time, I don’t use my Chromecast.
Leo: You stopped using
it. Yeah.
Jeff: Yeah. Pretty much because I—
Leo: Do we care that the
judges of the FISA Court—the FISA Court’s rotated in and out. The judges come from a pool, but that some of
these judges own Verizon stock? (Laughter) Do we care about
that? Is that a big story?
Jeff: Uh, it’s fun to be able
to find any fault we can with this whole system, but the truth is, it’s not
like Verizon makes money hand over fist from FISA decisions.
Leo: FISA Court judge Susan Wright purchased Verizon stock
valued at—unfortunately we don’t know the amount—$15,000 or less
on October 22. Dennis Saylor got a
dividend of less than $1,000. Government
disclosures don’t include hard amounts, so… You know, you’ve said many times you own what? I don’t know. A handful of shares of Google.
Jeff: Mm-hmm.
Leo: I don’t think that—I
don’t know. I mean, normally, a judge
will recuse himself or herself if it’s ruling on a case that he has a financial
interest in. So if he owns stock, he
should recuse himself on a case that involves Verizon, I guess. I don’t know. Promise all of this is so secret you just don’t know what’s going on.
Jeff: Yeah.
Leo: Are we going to see a
Nexus 6, a Nexus Phablet? Sources say Google
and Motorola are working on something. Android police—
Jeff: Of course, just as soon
as I buy the OnePlus One, of course, there’s a new
phone.
Leo: (Laughter)
Gina: (Laughter) But it’s a Phablet.
Leo: 5.9 inches is a little
bit bigger. The information corroborates
the earlier report, provides additional detail.
Jeff: I wonder if doing a
Nexus phone on Motorola was a condition of sale? Lenovo.
Leo: Oh, interesting.
Jeff: Just speculation.
Leo: Might be. Who would make that condition? Google or Lenovo?
Jeff: I think it’s good for
Lenovo.
Leo: It’s good for
Lenovo. Gives them
something to sell.
Jeff: Yeah.
Leo: The code name is Shamu, as you know, a killer whale. So it makes since it would be a large
device. I’m waiting for the new Motorola,
whatever that they’re going to call it, that they registered a trademark for
Motorola Maxx. They already have the
Droid Maxx. The Moto
Maxx.
Gina: The X successor of the
Moto X + 1 or…?
Leo: That’s what I‘m
wondering. That’s the one I’m very
interested in. We haven’t heard a
thing. Motorola has trademarked Moto
Maxx.
Gina: Mm-hmm.
Leo: They already have Maxx
for the Droid. I guess they don’t have Moto. All right. We have now gone through every story that
seems of—
Jeff: Yeah, we made a show out
of it. There wasn’t much news.
Gina: Should we talk real
quick about the Twitter hashtag? Well
Twitter’s announcement and then the ask Costolo hashtag
getting taken over a little bit yesterday?
Leo: Sure.
Gina: That’s kind of
interesting.
Leo: So Twitter stock went up
30%. They beat their street on their Q2
user growth revenue and they even turned a profit. Congratulations Twitter and their most recent
quarter. And so what? Evan did a Q&A? Or Dick did?
Gina: Yeah, Dick Costolo does a Q&A on CNBC, and CNBC says, “Okay,
hashtag your questions for the CEO of Twitter with ask Costolo,
instead of ask Dick, ask Costolo.
Leo: (Laughter) Probably better,
yeah.
Gina: And a tremendous number
of users, particularly in sort of my community and sort of the folks who rail
again harassment and abuse on social networks particularly around gender and
race and all that stuff really kind of took over the hashtag demanding to know
what is Twitter going to do about abuse and
harassments. Because truth is it’s very
easy to report spam on Twitter, and spammers get dealt with pretty quickly, but
when you’re being called names, when you’re being threatened and abused or
whatever, often there’s no response or very small response or a response that’s
two months later. So it was
interesting. It was very interesting to
watch the whole thing go down. A bunch
of people who I follow were participating in the hashtag and then retweeting questions that people were posting. And I actually participated in the
hashtag. I don’t do that very often. It was interesting.
Leo: What did you say? What did you ask?
Gina: I just said that I hope
that he was listening to those questions. I knew CNBC wasn’t going to pose those questions to him, right? And it looks like—
Leo: People asked, “Does
Twitter cull violent accounts? How many
times do you have to report an account that exists solely for smearing
people?” By the way, I get abused
mercilessly on Twitter. I just block the
account so I don’t ever see it, which seems to me fine. My Twitter stream for a long time I just
didn’t want to even look at it because it was so negative. So I just realized well, I can just block
those people and I just block them and I don’t see them.
Gina: But you know, someone
like Adria Richards, for example, when that whole
thing went down. I mean, she was
actively threatened and abused. There
was a huge spike in activity for that kind of thing and you do feel helpless. And when I defended her, I got crazy—and I
get sort of a low level of harassment always.
Leo: Yeah, Twitter’s full of
assholes.
Gina: Yeah, oh, absolutely,
absolutely.
Jeff: And Leo, just because
you don’t see it and it’s going on about you, that’s not a lot of fun to just have this unimagined—
Leo: Well, no. I’m completely in the dark about it unless
somebody comes to me and says it’s going on, I don’t
see it. Maybe you guys see. You probably do see it, but I don’t—
Jeff: No.
Leo: —it doesn’t bother
me. And frankly, it seems like—and
there’s a good article, a blog post, about the least Twitter could do, Danilo Campos writing, about some of the things that
Twitter could do. For instance, block
users who account—you should have a block all users—allow users to block all
users who’s accounts are less than 30 days old.
Gina: Yeah.
Leo: Because the problem with
this, and I can understand Twitter’s position. It’s the same thing as saying to Yahoo, “Hey, you got to stop
spam.” Well, good luck.
Jeff: Yeah.
Leo: It’s easy to create a
Twitter account. People do it all the
time, and they do it particularly to harass.
Gina: And they just keep
creating new ones.
Leo: So I guess giving us
better tools… And they just create new
ones. So Danilo’s saying give us tools to block users whose accounts are brand new. Block users who’s follow accounts are less than a threshold. A lot of the accounts that attack me have ten followers and they were
created last month. Block new users
whose at replies include any words the user decides. So you could say, “Hey, if they say screw
Leo Laporte, well, I don’t want to see that.” Block any user who’s been blocked by a
certain number of people I’m following. It works pretty well for me just to go into my feed and whenever
somebody says something I find trollish, I just block
them, and I never see them again.
Gina: Right.
Leo: And it’s really made my
Twitter feed a lot more pleasant.
Gina: Right, right. But if you have a concentrated attack
(laughter), I don’t know, if some Reddit board decides to attack a particular user—and I block a lot.
Leo: But what could Twitter
do? I mean, how could Twitter…?
Gina: Yeah, I mean, I think
that some of these suggestions that he made are pretty good. This gets into issues of free speech and what
could they possibly do and is it Twitter’s job to police what people can say on
their service. But it does sort of get
down to that—and this is the same question what happened with Reddit with the troll who was posting whatever it was. Posting photos of young women in bikinis or
whatever. I forget. Violentacrez. The Violentacrez story. And it kind of came down to this thing where
it’s like we’re a platform and does the telephone company moderate what people
say on the phone and this whole question. I sort of land on the side of Twitter has built spam filters, right? And so has Reddit. These platforms for communication have built
algorithmic ways to deal with spam in order to improve the user experience, and
I think creating algorithms or offering users more control, like some of these
controls that Danilo proposed, is a way that they can
also improve the user experience. But
they typically don’t because these are usually folks that get threatened and
harassed on Twitter are disempowered groups of folks and people.
Leo: Right, right.
Gina: They’re people of
color. They’re women. They’re not privileged folks with lots of
free time and lots of money and lots of power who don’t feel threatened by
someone photoshopping an image of them.
Leo: Right.
Gina: So anyway, I thought it
was interesting.
Jeff: Gina, it goes to the
right to be forgotten question too.
Gina: Mm-hmm. It does.
Jeff: Because Google does
block certain things, and I’m objecting greatly to the right to be
forgotten. Some people say to me, “Hold
on Jarvis. They kill certain stuff.” And if you go back to Brandeis and Warren and
their ground-breaking essay on privacy in the U.S., it came down to a right to
be let alone. And that was their
definition of privacy in the end. And so
part of what you’re saying really is the sense that if you’re not well known,
if you’re not trying to be out there, if you’re not trying anything and people
are just coming after you, do you have a right to be left alone? And it sounds right that we should, but then
again, you have to get pretty far down the road on harassment in real life to
get an injunction slapped against you.
Leo: Gina, would it be
sufficient for you if Twitter provided some of these tools that Danilo’s suggesting?
Gina: Yeah, I think that these
are some ways to give users control. I
mean, I’ve certainly been in situations where my mentions column not only made
me feel sort of upset because I was being called names and whatever—
Jeff: Yes, yes.
Gina: —but made me feel
helpless because I felt like I can block this person. They can continue to say things about me that
I will no longer see, but will still be out there. Is it my job to sort of monitor whether or
not these people are going to show up at my house or what? And it’s that feeling of helplessness. I think that if the platform is built well,
you want to give users a feeling of control. So yeah, I think that some of these controls are good suggestions.
Leo: The best they could do
is make it so you don’t see it. That does not respond to your issue of—
Jeff: Right, exactly.
Leo: —should I pay attention
to what they’re saying in case they’re actually going to commit an act of
violence.
Gina: Right.
Leo: You have to read those
to do that. So in that case, what do you
do? Does Twitter have to—?
Gina: Well, I’d want faster
responses from Twitter—
Leo: If it’s abusive speech,
they should ban that person.
Gina: Yeah, and they have to
make that decision every day.
Leo: But that person can
instantly create a new account. I mean,
it takes no time.
Gina: Right. That’s right. That’s right, but it feels like there are ways both programmatically and
with a little human intervention that you could detect those kinds of things.
Leo: Block somebody’s IP
address?
Gina: Yeah, you could detect
if it’s coming from the same IP address. You can detect to see—
Leo: Yeah, we do that in the
chatroom. We actually do do that in the chatroom. We enforce those rules.
Jeff: You know, Leo. I think part of the issue though it that—I’m
not going to give this person a moment’s attention, so please allow me to be
very generic—somebody wrote a really nasty piece about me some time ago. Well, somebody really nasty one you know
about a long time ago, but a little more recently, and I could tell what it was
going to be a paragraph in and I just didn’t read it.
Leo: Right.
Jeff: And yeah, I saw a couple
of people tweet about it at the time, and I just ignored it. I’m not going to give the person the
slightest satisfaction that they—
Leo: What else can you
do? What else can you do?
Jeff: Yeah, I didn’t see
it. And so to some level—I haven’t had
anything that women have, but I’ve had a few nut jobs come after me, and at
some point if they get absolutely no satisfaction from—if they know that you
are not seeing what they’re saying, it takes away some of their motivation.
Leo: Well, I’ll give you an
example. Some of the people who are
tweeting against me are tweeting that to sponsors. Now what do we do?
Jeff: Right.
Gina: Right.
Leo: And it concerns the
sponsors. The sponsors don’t
understand. I mean, we tell the sponsor,
“Oh, they’re just trolls. Don’t worry
about it,” but it concerns them.
Jeff: It’s the celebrity. The troll’s a celebrity. Yeah.
Leo: That concerns them. So that’s an economic—I mean, violence is a
whole different thing and much, much worse, obviously. But I don’t know what you do—
Gina: I think the three of us
have been public figures to some extent for a long time. I mean, Life Hacker, my first two months at
Life Hacker, I was getting into the boiling water of being just exposed to so
many people. I mean, I was shell-shocked.
I just never had such a big audience and—
Leo: It’s horrible, isn’t
it? Yeah.
Gina: —I’d never been
criticized so—and nitpicked and just discussed so publically. It’s very jarring if you’ve never had that
situation before. And now I feel like I
have a much thicker skin. I’m much more
likely to just brush off somebody who you know. But in the beginning, and for someone who’s not used to it—and I think
that this is happening to people who have a couple hundred followers and this
is the first time they’ve really had any sort of public persona or they’re
getting some sort of following for whatever reason. I think it’s genuinely frightening, and I
don’t think the solution is, “Hey, just don’t pay attention. Don’t worry about it.” I think in the moment, you feel really alone
and you think, “What have I shared online? What can somebody find out about me if they’re really dedicated to
making my life miserable?” And you start
to reevaluate and feel unsafe and disempowered and helpless. It spirals. I think it’s a hard experience for nubes. And I think for us it’s easy to say, “All
right, this is another crazy.”
Jeff: It’s all true, but I
don’t think the solution is an algorithm that’s going to cut it out because
right to be forgotten, right to be let alone. I want you to wait for the next law to come out of Europe to say that
people have the right to kill people who are being abusive to them, kill
comments by people who are being abusive to them. And we’re back in the same discussion about
freedom of speech.
Leo: One of my trolls is
mentally ill.
Gina: Oh, yeah. Mine too.
Leo: Diagnosable. And perhaps could be dangerous. Who knows?
Gina: Yes.
Leo: The process exists, and
I’ve done this before where you go to Twitter. You actually go to your police, and if they think that that’s reasonable
that you should be in fear for your personal safety, they get a subpoena; they
go to Twitter. Twitter won’t give you
this without a subpoena, but Twitter will give it to you with a subpoena. They give you the IP address of the
person. Then you have to get another
subpoena, go to that person’s Internet service provider. We have done this. And track that person down, and then the
local police in that jurisdiction go to that person’s house. That’s all you can do. What is Twitter supposed to do in that? Would you want a Twitter
that just says whenever I ask, “Oh, yeah. I’ll give you that person’s IP address”?
Gina: No, no, no. No.
Jeff: There’s a few things that you can do.
Gina: Go ahead, Jeff.
Jeff: There’s a range here,
right? Take for a moment the person who
needs their meds out of this because nothing can fix them.
Leo: Believe me, I am sympathetic to mental illness. Mental illness is a disease. It’s an illness.
Jeff: I mean, literally, they
need their meds.
Leo: Yeah, they’re in trouble
and I feel for them.
Jeff: But for the people who
just troll for the sake of trolling, the sake of getting at you, what we need
is for society’s norms to mean that people pile up in defense of you and deal
with it and reject the people.
Leo: Is that the right thing
to do though?
Jeff: There’s a horrible show
on ABC I think it is. The What Would You Do? show.
Leo: Yeah.
Jeff: They’ll have a guy,
sleazy guy picking up on some girl who’s alone in a café.
Leo: I hate that stuff.
Jeff: I hate the show. I hate the show because it tries to make
people look bad.
Leo: Right.
Jeff: But some brave grandma
will go and defend and say, “Get away from her” and “Come here, honey.” Then it shows that there are still decent
people on earth. But there are and why
won’t a sleazy guy go into the café and just hit on any 15-year-old girl? Because there are norms and somebody will
stand up and somebody will do something. We have to be in a society but to figure out ways where that happens—
Gina: I agree.
Leo: Problem is, yeah, it’s
true in a café that works. It doesn’t
work on Twitter. It does the opposite on
Twitter. It encourages them.
Gina: Twitter can offer tools
that would make that happen. For
example, Leo, if I see somebody abusing you and making threats toward you, I
can’t report that person for abusing you. You have to report that person, right? That doesn’t really make sense.
Leo: So they could change
that.
Jeff: Right.
Gina: Why shouldn’t we all be able
to look out for one another?
Jeff: Good point.
Gina: Why shouldn’t I be able
to see oh, ten of my friends have blocked this guy?
Leo: Right, right.
Gina: That would make me feel
less alone. It just feels like when I
was a little kid and I was getting bullied—
Jeff: Yeah, great question.
Gina: —my sister marched
around the corner and told the girl she’d punch her in the face
(laughter). This is how it works sort of
in life, and I feel like Twitter could provide more tools to help people
feel—to help users feel more empowered. I felt like the point of the hashtag yesterday is that a lot of users,
Twitter users, and the majority of Twitter users are people of color and at
least I would guess about half are women, right, feel disempowered and feel
helpless and feel like their reports don’t get any sort of response and don’t
feel like they have the tools that they need to deal with them.
Leo: It’s my guess that Dick
is pretty sympathetic to this, and I would expect him, to the degree that he
can, that he would respond to this, right?
Gina: He is. He said that he was in a meeting with his
abuse team today—
Leo: Good, yeah.
Gina: —after this whole thing
happened yesterday.
Leo: Yeah, I feel like he’s a
good guy. I don’t feel like he’s evil in
any way.
Jeff: No, not really.
Gina: Yeah, no. I don’t either. I don’t either. It’s interesting though that this
(laughter)—hat the earnings report was what spurred this, the hashtag
takeover. I found it really interesting
to watch.
Leo: Yeah. Well, in a way, he was a victim of Twitter’s
(laughter) malleability, flexibility.
Gina: Right.
Jeff: Yeah.
Gina: Well, I guess the dick
bar was pretty bad as well, right? That
was also the hashtag movement right against the Twitter (laughter).
Leo: You’ve got to think that
Dick Costolo, the CEO of Twitter gets more of this
than anybody, right? Don’t you think he
gets a lot of abuse?
Gina: He can afford
security. He can afford security
(laughter).
Leo: All right. This is the only show that we talk about this
stuff on. It’s a good conversation.
Gina: Thank you for indulging
me on that one.
Leo: Yeah, I think it’s very
important.
Jeff: It’s really good points,
Gina.
Leo: As always with this
show, we talk about the bigger philosophical issues, the bigger issues that we
are faced with in this new world of ours. But now would be a good time to get to the back of the book, the tip,
the number, and the tool of the week. Let’s start with your tip, Gina.
Gina: So you can now ask
Google Now for directions to My Hotel.
Leo: Oh, I like that.
Gina: Yeah, yeah. So if you’ve got hotel reservations stored in
your Gmail account, Google Now knows about it, and you can say, “Show me
restaurants near my hotel or get me directions to my hotel from here,” and
Google Now will automatically map the phrase “my hotel” to the hotel where
you’re staying. Pretty
neat. So it’s kind of an
extension of “get me directions to work” or “get me directions to home,” and
it’s just now a temporary location if you’re staying in a hotel. Pretty smart.
Leo: Yeah. My hotel.
Gina: My hotel, yeah.
Leo: Do you have to have a
confirmation from that hotel in your e-mail or something like that?
Gina: Yep, yep.
Leo: That’s how it knows.
Gina: Mm-hmm.
Leo: Cool. Jeff, you have, as usual, many numbers. Pick as many as you want.
Jeff: I’ll go over this one.
Leo: Okay.
Jeff: So after the stock went
up this week on Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, you might have seen, is now worth
more than the Google founders.
Leo: Wow.
Jeff: Not that that’s terribly
meaningful, but what the heck? So it’s
$33.3 billion, ranking him at number 16. The Google founders are 17 and 18. Bezos is 20.
Leo: Wow. Bill Gates used to be the richest man with a
mere $32 billion dollars.
Gina: So wait. Who’s number one then?
Jeff: I was afraid you were
going to ask me that, Gina.
Leo: (Laughter)
Gina: Oh, sorry. I’m sorry (laughter). I don’t deal in number 6 or 7, Jeff. I want to know—
Leo: Who’s number one? Who’s number one?
Gina: Oh, this is okay. This is just the tech guys. Okay.
Leo: It’s probably Warren
Buffet or something.
Gina: Yeah, probably. All right.
Leo: No, Bill Gates is still
the richest man in the world, $84.7 billion.
Jeff: Jesus.
Gina: Wow.
Jeff: That’s with him giving
it away.
Gina: Yeah.
Leo: His net worth has grown
8% this year, but it’s not just Microsoft. He also has significant investments in the Canadian National Railway
Company.
Jeff: (Laughter)
Leo: And Republic
Services. I don’t know what they do. Four hundred million
dollars in dividends alone this year. Number two, Carlos Slim, the Mexican telecommunications tycoon with the
best name in the name world.
Jeff: And a lot of New York
Times stock.
Leo: Carlos Slim sounds like
he’s a poker player. He has $78.8
billion. So Bill Gates is still the
richest man in the world. Inflation,
that’s all that is. Boy, just give me 1
billion, just 1 billion.
Gina: Just one? That’s all you want.
Jeff: You’re greedy. I’ll do the 100 million.
Gina: (Laughter) I’ll go a hundred
100 million.
Leo: All right, all right,
all right. Each of us gets 100 million.
Gina: (laughter) All right,
perfect. It’s only 300 million.
Leo: That’s just 300
million. That’s nothing.
Gina: Now we’ve got to
convince somebody to give it to us (laughter).
Leo: Listen. And my tool is—I think it’s pretty
obvious. It’s a great story because you
cannot get the OnePlus 1 phone, at least not at its
face value, which is a remarkable $300 for the 16GB, $350 for the 64GB. Top of the line. They call it a flagship killer, and it is
with the Qualcomm 801 Quadcore Snapdragon with a
great camera. You saw probably Jason’s
review on Before You Buy or yesterday on All About Android. He’s been using this
phone. But we’ve been trying like the
dickens because you have to either play a contest. I entered all the contests I could and I was
going to destroy my phone on video, but I did everything else and asked for
invitations. Finally, one of our viewers
very kindly offered—
Jeff: Did you get the same
person I did?
Leo: I don’t know.
Gina: No, I think they were
different.
Leo: Offered us a phone, so
we said yes. Jason bought it, reviewed
it. Well, I bought it. Jason reviewed it, and Jason very kindly has
let me take it from him.
Jeff: Yeah, poor Jason gets
Google Glass and you get the OnePlus. Not fair.
Leo: Hey!
Gina: (Laughter)
Leo: Well, maybe I’ll give it
back when the Moto X + 1 comes out or whatever.
Jeff: I want to give a shutout
to Ryan Suzuki who tweeted publically the offer.
Leo: Is that how you got
one? Is that how you got it?
Jeff: Yeah, and then he
offered Gina one too, but Gina had already gotten a kind viewer.
Gina: Yeah.
Leo: So thank you to all
three of our benefactors, but what the hell is going on with OnePlus? Why are
they making it so hard to get this phone?
Gina: I mean, if it’s a marketing
stunt, it’s working.
Leo: Yeah, but at this point
you want to say, “Okay, now we’ve got a million of them.”
Gina: Right.
Jeff: Maybe they don’t.
Leo: I’m calling shenanigans.
Jeff: Yeah, I think it’s marketing.
Gina: They said in their
shipping e-mail that they’re a startup and they’re still refining their
processes and to be patient. And it took
them a couple of days, like several days to process my order.
Jeff: Yeah.
Gina: Just to process the
order. So I don’t know. Maybe they’re—
Leo: Here’s what I
think. I think they’re selling it below
cost. I think there’s no way this costs
$350.
Jeff: Yes.
Leo: It is definitely
marketing, but it is not marketing for OnePlus. OnePlus was founded
by two people who I think may even still work for a company called OPO. And OPO makes
Gina: OPO.
Leo: OnePlus One. O-P-O. And OPO makes a phone that is virtually
identical—
Jeff: Coincidence?
Leo: It’s virtually identical
called the Find 7, and it costs a little bit more (laughter). It costs what it should cost, around $700
right? This is currently not available
yet either in the United States, but we’ll—
Gina: Oh, and the websites
look so similar by the way.
Leo: Yeah, so here’s what I
think. In fact, in some ways, the Find
is even better. It’s got a higher res
display, etc. This they’re selling it at
a loss so they don’t want to sell too many. It is a marketing ploy, but not for this phone. It’s a marketing ploy for OPO and the
Find. That’s my—
Jeff: Interesting.
Leo: Whoops.
Gina: Interesting. Oh, you turned on the light (laughter).
Leo: Jason complained about
that. It’s too easy to do because it
does this gestures. A V turns on the light. Otherwise, I can’t figure this out.
Gina: I’m
convinced. Now that I saw that the UI
and the website is basically exactly the same, I think you might be right there.
Leo: I think OPO very
cleverly said, “Okay, we’re going to create this dummy company, fund it, build this phone that is essentially the same as the Find,
Find 7.”
Gina: We’re going to ship
Cyanogen, do invites, and we’re going to get the most influential and dedicated
Android power users to—
Leo: Yeah. And by the way, the Find also runs Cyanogen.
Gina: Oh, the Find does run
Cyanogen. Okay.
Leo: And I think what they’ve
done is that they’re selling this—we got this at half the actual cost. Although I saw—was it I-Supply? One of the companies said it should cost them
around $200 to build, so maybe they are making some money on it. I’m not sure.
Gina: Is the Find unlocked in
the whole deal? I mean, maybe this is
their play edition.
Leo: Well—
Gina: I mean, maybe this is
their play edition. This is their
Nexus. This is the developer enthusiast
phone.
Leo: And that’s the other
thing is you can get the older Find. You
can’t get the new one that’s really close to this. You can get the N1, the Find 5, but this new
Find 7 is just about to come out. I
think this is all a marketing ploy for the Find 7. The reason they don’t want a
lot of people to buy it is because it costs them. That’s my guess. Otherwise, why do it? I mean, at some point, you’ve got to pull the plug, you’ve got to end the marketing and make
millions.
Gina: Yeah.
Leo: I don’t know. The OnePlus One is
slightly larger, a millimeter wider. It’s thinner and lighter than the Find, but I think functionally, it’s
pretty similar. I don’t know. I can’t figure it out. You tell me.
Jeff: Yep.
Leo: But if you can get an
invite—now there are companies selling these at a premium. Expansys US has it
for $500, a $200 markup.
Jeff: Find 7a in Germany, they
quote it in U.S. dollars, is $500.
Leo: But it is my tool of the
week. I am really impressed with this
phone, and it feels good. It’s a
5-1/2-inch screen. The other one that
you probably would want to look at is the G3 if you want to get a big screen
phone. But I’ll be curious—so you’re
both getting OnePluses.
Gina: I
was going to say, I mean, with the exception of one of the Nexuses, this might
be the first time that the three hosts of TWiG have
settled on the same phone—
Leo: Have had the same phone.
Gina: —as our daily, every day
phone. That’s saying something.
Leo: Yeah.
Gina: Hook, line, and sinker,
man.
Jeff: I’m just pissed I’ve change
to SIM.
Leo: (Laughter)
Gina: (Laughter)
Jeff: I also want to be able
to go back and forth.
Leo: It is not a nano shaman; it is a micro SIM.
Jeff: And every time I change
to SIM, something goes wrong with my unlimited data account.
Leo: Aww, that sucks.
Gina: Aww, that’s not
good. You’re going to have a Comcast day
too.
Leo: Yeah.
Gina: Well, apparently,
there’s an adapter. You can snap the Nano SIM into a Micro SIM adapter?
Leo: Yes.
Gina: So that’s a possibility.
Leo: When I use my SIM cutter
I saved the frame, so if I could only find that, but yeah, it’s just a little
bit that goes around it.
Gina: Yeah, so Jeff, maybe you
want to try that.
Leo: Yeah, it pops into it
and then it’s a full size.
Gina: Every time I go to
T-Mobile, they’re like, “How did you get this plan?”
Leo: (Laughter)
Gina: I’m
just like, “Don’t change anything. Just
give me a new SIM. Just don’t change
anything.” (Laughter)
Leo: All right, ladies and
gentlemen, this concludes a very fine this week in Google. It was nice. We had just a little time to sit back, relax, talk philosophy. And I like that.
Gina: Yeah.
Leo: I appreciate that.
Jeff: Yeah.
Leo: Thank you so much for
being here. Gina Trapani, you’ll find
her at Life—no, not Lifehacker. Smarterware.org. But mostly at ThinkUp.
Gina: ThinkUp,
yeah. I’ve got to—
Leo: In fact, if I go to—I
haven’t looked at my insights this week. LeoLaporte.ThinkUp.com.
Gina: We launched a free trial
I think actually since the last time we talked. You can try ThinkUp now for free. Just go to ThinkUp.com; you sign in with your
Twitter or Facebook.
Leo: Oh, do that.
Gina: You
get totally free, all the features for 14 days. Yeah, yeah.
Leo: So here’s the top
level. What’s happening with my tweets. Whatever Leo Laporte said in the past week must have been
memorable. There were 77 favorites, 63
replies, 23 re-tweets.
Gina: Nice chart.
Leo: Three interests—yeah,
it’s a good chart. I like that. Three interesting people followed me. More than that. Ohh, but I only had
10 tweets, which is four fewer than the week
before. Here’s what I favorited in the years passed. It’s great stuff. Thirty percent of my tweets (laughter)—I like
this. Self-reflection is powerful stuff.
Gina: (Laughter)
Leo: She’s definitely changed
that one. Thirty percent of my tweets
contain “I, me, mine, or myself.” That’s an awful lot.
Jeff: (Laughter)
Leo: You know, it’s not all of them. My best response between 5 and 6 p.m. See? That’s good to know. I want to
keep track about that, so this is good. My popular tweet a year ago. Gosh, that was a year ago?
Gina: (Laughter) I know,
right? I say that every day when I see that
insight. I’m like, “Whoa.”
Leo: A year ago? Really?
Gina: Time
flies.
Leo: This is fun. So ladies and gentlemen, I thank you so much. Gina Trapani, for being here. We couldn’t do it without you, and don’t
forget to watch her on All About Android, which is
every Tuesday evening on this network.
Gina: It’s a lot of fun.
Leo: 5 p.m. Pacific, 8 p.m.
Eastern. Jeff Jarvis is going to relax
today. He’s not going to attempt
anything too complicated. Whatever you
do, stay off ladders. Do not try to fix
the well.
Jeff: Well, we did that last
week. I told you that—was that last
week?
Leo: No, you had well
problems last week?
Jeff: Yeah, we did. Yeah, yeah. At the same time, we were putting in a new
septic because the septic broke.
Leo: I was just going to say,
if the well’s gone, the septic must be next.
Jeff: Yeah, it was both of
them.
Leo: Country living, country
living.
Gina: Wow.
Jeff: So $28,000 for a place
to put my...
Leo: So you had to dig a new
one?
Jeff: Oh, yeah.
Gina: Whoa, whoa, whoa. Twenty-eight grand?
Leo: Oh, yeah. It’s expensive.
Jeff: Twenty-eight grand.
Gina: Oh, I’m living in the
city.
Leo: Yeah, well, you have to
dig it.
Jeff: Well, I didn’t dig it.
Leo: (Laughter). Go out there with a shovel.
Jeff: Oh, the technology now
is unbelievable.
Leo: Oh, it’s not just a
little backhoe?
Jeff: Oh, God no, god no. So there’s two cisterns.
Leo: Yeah, you have to switch
back and forth right? Every six months.
Jeff: Oh, I didn’t know that
part.
Leo: Oh, yeah.
Jeff: Okay, so it goes into
the thing. Then the leach field is half
a football field.
Leo: Yep.
Jeff: Dug down, four feet of
stone and sand.
Leo: That’s right, yep.
Jeff: Then these big, black,
thick tubes across that. And then the
white tubes into that.
Leo: Yeah, yeah.
Jeff: Then more sand on top of
that. And then of
course white pipes sticking up all over my yard now.
Leo: Aww. (Laughter) We’re both on septic systems. We’ll have a little conversation (laughter).
Jeff: Yes, yes. Off the air, we can paraphrase—
Leo: How old was your system?
Jeff: Forty-five years.
Leo: Oh, yeah. Well, you got a good use out of it.
Gina: Oh, okay. Twenty-eight grand!
Leo: Oh, it’s expensive.
Gina: That’s crazy.
Leo: But you save up. Every year, you put a thousand dollars in
there and you’ll be all right.
Jeff: Uggh.
Leo: You save up for your
leach field (laughter).
Jeff: I’m never getting a new
car.
Leo: (Laughter)
Gina: (Laughter)
Jeff: My car is now 10 years
old.
Leo: That’s the joy of
country living.
Jeff: Yeah.
Leo: Thank you all for
joining us. We do TWiG,
This Week in Google, every Wednesday. It’s kind of my last show of the week before my weekend, which is
tomorrow and Friday.
Jeff: You get to go to
Comcast.
Leo: I’m devoting my weekend
to DMV and Comcast. That’s exciting.
Jeff: (Laughter)
Leo: That’s exciting.
Gina: It’s a good time.
Leo: One p.m. Pacific, 4 p.m.
Eastern, 2000 UTC on the TWiT network. Please stop by and watch us live if you
can. If you can’t, on demand audio and
video, always available Twit.tv/Twig or wherever
you get your shows, including iTunes, Stitcher, Xbox
Music, or any of the great third-party apps developed for the TWiT network including Roku,
Windows Phone, and of course iOS and Android. Thanks for being here. We’ll see
you next time on TWiG!