This Week in Google 264 (Transcript)
Leo LaPorte: It’s
time for TWiG, This Week in Google. Jeff and Gina are
here. Yes, it’s true. Amazon, not Google, bought twitch.tv for $1B. Jeff and I and Gina too. We’ll try to figure out why next on TWiG.
Net casts
you love, from people you trust. This is TWiT! Bandwidth
for This Week in Google is provided by CacheFly,
cachefly.com.
This is TWiG, This Week in Google, episode 264. Recorded August 27,
2014
Flinty Parsimony
This Week
in Google is brought to you by Casper, an online retailer of premium mattresses
for a fraction of the price. Because everyone deserves a
great night’s sleep. Get $50 off any mattress purchase by visiting
capsersleep.com/twig and entering the promo code TWIG. And by Landtronics, maker of the X-Printer Server. Print from any Android phone, tablet, Chrome Book, or Kindle Fire to virtually
any printer. For more information, visit xprintserver.com/twit and enter the
code TWIT to receive free shipping on your order. It’s time for TWiG, This Week in Google. The Google
verse and all of that stuff, Facebook. I got schooled in Facebook; we’re
going to talk about it in a second. But first ladies and gentlemen, I give you
Jeffrey Jarvis, professor of journalism at City University of New York. He’s in
his office right now in Times Square. He is the author of such great books as
Public Parts, What Would Google Do?, Gutenberg the
Geek, blogs at buzzmachine.com. And he’s the closest thing to a public
intellectual in the United States we have.
Jeff Jarvis: Don’t put a target on my
back. There’s no such thing as a public intellectual.
Leo: There is in France.
Jeff: Well yea, it’s France.
Leo: We don’t really have that concept here.
Jeff: I never fully understood what that means.
Leo: It means… well first let me introduce Gina and
then I’ll tell you what that means. Gina Trapani, she’s a public nerd.
Gina Trapani: Yea, not a public
intellectual.
Leo: No, you’re brilliant, you are an intellectual.
Gina: I’m a public symbolton.
It’s okay.
Leo: Public nerd, public geek. She founded Life Hacker,
okay. You could after that, retire. But no then she went on to do such things
as Think Up, thinkup.com. And who could ever forget the Google Wave Bible?
Gina: Aww, you can’t. I really want to raise that part
of your brain, Leo.
Jeff: Do you have a box of them at home, Gina?
Leo: The Google Wave book has the
right to be forgotten.
Gina: When I was setting up my standing desk, I use the
box of books that never sold as my footrest. So they actually did come in
handy.
Jeff: In the movie, page one, David Carr and Brian Stelder and company about the New York
Times. You see the copy of What Would Google Do? which David Carr uses only as a wrist rest for his laptop.
Leo: Oh that’s so mean. That’s almost intentional dig.
But that’s what happens when you’re a public intellectual. So a public
intellectual goes back; we’ve had them in the days of Dick Havoc, where there
were actually places…
Jeff: That’s the worst.
Leo: I love Dick Havoc. Where there were places you
could go on mainstream media and just be smart. Gorvidal is a public intellectual. Mailer, Normal Mailer was a public intellectual.
Carson would interview people like that sometimes. So a
public intellectual is somebody who is a well-known persona but not because
they’re in movies. But because they’re a writer, a thinker, they have
big things to say. And I think you count.
Gina: I co-sign, I agree.
Jeff: No you’re putting a target on me. Please, no.
Leo: By the way, is that the new thing, I co-sign? I
like it.
Gina: Plus one, I co-sign.
Leo: So we had Robert Scoble on, boy it’s great to have Robert on. I love having people on TWiT who are polarizing. Dvorak; those are the people who
are really successful. You love them or hate them but it gets people going. And
Robert and I had a fairly heated conversation back and forth for 45 minutes on
Facebook. He said in one year from now, you will come back to me, he said you
were right, Robert. Facebook is killing it. They are the social platform. I
said what are you talking about? It’s getting worse by the moment. He says
you’re doing it wrong. But my position is well you shouldn’t have to do
anything. Anyway, we’re going to have Robert come back and do an hour-long
special on how to cultivate your Facebook feed.
Jeff: I like that being in the timeline of life. So that a year from now when he says Facebook is over... I
love Robert, I think he’s wonderful. But the bipolar nature
of his technology; love and hates.
Leo: I agree. The Robert Scoble seal of approval does not carry much weight.
Jeff: It tends to lose its glue after a while.
Leo: But I think he was making some interesting points.
Jeff: Yes he does.
Leo: As he often does. Chiefly, if you really care
enough to put the energy into it, you can make Facebook something you’ll enjoy.
So I have been trying to do it. It ain’t easy.
Jeff: Well of course the big fight these days about
Facebook is that number one, primarily you don’t know to whom you’re
publishing. Same with Google Plus, but that gets left out of the discussion.
That’s the primary issue. And then the second complaint is that the Fergusons
don’t bubble up. And Q has an article today, I didn’t
put it in, but the echo chamber argument. People don’t feel right having harsh
political opinions on Facebook. So I don’t walk to my neighbor’s house to
borrow a cup of sugar and say by the way Barrack Obama is great. You’re wrong
to think he’s awful.
Leo: As soon as I saw that study, I thought oh this is
the filter bubble back and Jeff’s going to have something to say about it. This
is Claire Kane Miller who by the way gets things wrong more often than right.
She writes for the New York Times. As soon as I started, I thought I don’t know
what it is…
Jeff: The internet it seems is contributing to the
polarization of America. As people surround themselves with people who think
like them and hesitate to say anything different. Now my response to this on
Twitter was, if this is such an echo chamber, how come all I see is arguments?
Leo: That’s a good point. We’ve talked about this
before.
Jeff: If this is an echo chamber, all we’d say is co-sign,
plus one that! Couldn’t have said it better myself! Right? How often do you see that? You don’t! Because people are arguing their faces
off on this stupid thing we call a net.
Leo: This goes back to the book Eli Paraser wrote called the Filter Bubble where he said what happens in these networks is;
I don’t think this is a poor thesis that is that, you cultivate your feeds.
That’s the whole point of Twitter and Facebook and everything else, that you
cultivate your feeds that only include people you agree with. You cultivate
your news; you watch Fox news because you agree with them.
Jeff: It’s not just about agreement or disagreement,
it’s also about relevance. I’ve debated Eli in public about this. Number one is
that it’s a hell of a lot more filter bubble to have one editor of the New York
Times to select what you care about. That’s a far worse filter bubble. And
number two, I do see lots of things from all over
creation. I see them on Twitter, I see them on TV, I see them, I get bombarded with all kinds of stuff. And argue that
these services shouldn’t give me higher relevance is ridiculous.
Leo: And you also make the point that from time in
memorial we have surrounded ourselves with friends, loved ones, colleagues, who
agree with us. Here in Northern California, we’ve pretty much pushed
Republicans to the sea.
Jeff: To the South.
Gina: I think that you don’t see people agreeing with
one another as much as you see them debate. But there’s a lot of liking and favoriting. There’s a lot of
at-a-boys and at-a-girls that are little more silent. I think liking and
silent…
Jeff: I don’t get much of that, Gina. Nobody’s
at-a-boying me.
Leo: I think more to the point, and you do this in
life, you try to arrange things in such a way that you’re surrounded by people
who share your world view. Do you not?
Gina: Yea, you do. Although, it’s
interesting. Because of Facebook, I am connected to distant family
members or my wife is connected to coworkers. And you get kind of a glimpse of
their internal life in a way that you might not with a distant family member or
an acquaintance. So there are certainly like family members or coworkers whose
political views or religious views are so different than my own; and I think in
those circumstances there are certain topics I don’t bring up in the holidays
because I see the monologue or the dialogue on Facebook going on the rest of
the year. I don’t engage in it because I don’t want to make enemies or
whatever. But that was what I thought of when I read this article. Yea, there
are times when I just avoid certain topics with certain folks because I know
it’s only going to get weird and bad.
Jeff: Facebook is more than the Thanksgiving table.
Twitter is more. They’re different contexts for interactions.
Leo: Certainly more than you would get in life than
normally. You get dissenting points of view. More than you would get in the New
York Times. Or Fox News, or MSNBC. You get other
points of view and I’ve certainly been exposed to both Israel
Gaza for instance. Q did a study in 2004 that you couldn’t really
replicate today because everyone’s online. But there was some portion of people
that get their news offline, TV and such, some of it their news online. Those
who got their news online were more exposed to their opponents’ arguments than
those who got their news offline, at the time.
Leo: I think it’s true. I do think it’s true. I think
I’m much more tolerant of opposing viewpoints than I used to be, to be honest. Because of this.
Jeff: Yea. I work in magnificent school, CUNY is a temple university because it represents New York. And New York
represents the world. And we value that tremendously. I get perspective from my
students, which is really important. But I also get perspective from my friends
online. I get people like Raffed Ali; the public
picture of he and his brother going to school in a
horse cart back in India in the day. And I just begged him for more because it
was a glimpse of a different life. And he has a different perspective on the
world and I have tons of friends like that online and I just value. I’m not
arguing with them, I’m not going to say well you have a dumb life. Because they don’t. I’m going to savor these glimpses into
their lives. Friends of mine online who are from Turkey or from Iraq, and that
kind of diversity, I have far more of that than I ever could have had living in
my little suburb.
Leo: So let’s throw out both the New York Times article
and the Q study.
Jeff: And while you’re at it, throw out Scoble with the bath water, will you? John’s
joking, Robert. John’s joking.
Leo: That is one place, Facebook particularly is one place where I see dissenting views. I follow
people because I know them or because they’re family members. Not because they
agree with me. Twitter maybe also.
Jeff: I see more of the I did
this and I did that.
Leo: I see that, too. But I have a few friends whose
political viewpoints differ greatly from mine. And I see a lot of their posts.
Google Plus, I pretty much tend to see people who agree with me.
Jeff: But you could also kill those who don’t.
Leo: That’s maybe part of it. On the other hand, Google
Plus really lends itself to discussion more I think.
Jeff: It really does. That’s important to us. What we’re
seeing is the form matters. There was a, sorry the lights just went off. Hold
on a second.
Leo: Jeff is plagued by the flinty parsimony of the
University. The lights will turn off if Jeff doesn’t move enough.
Jeff: Your tax dollars at work, man.
Leo: By the way, I like that phrase. I just made that
up. Flinty parsimony.
Jeff: I like that. It’s a flavor of ice cream.
Leo: I should write that down. I’m going to use that
somewhere. Maybe the title of this show.
Gina: Parsimony, mmm.
Jeff: Parsimonence.
Leo: You must have been watching the Simpsons marathon. Mmm,
parsimony.
Jeff: This is what happens when you play games for 20
hours. Odd things start to amuse you.
Leo: At least my brain still works. I wasn’t sure.
Jeff: So there was a famous study done at the NIH,
actually done by the father of my college girlfriend, John Calhoun. Growing rats into an environment. Remember that one?
Leo: No, tell me more.
Jeff: They overcrowded and then what happened.
Leo: Yea, that’s very famous.
Jeff: There were bridges, and some rats staked out the
good spots. And they overcrowded the spots. And so there’s always been debates
about Calhoun’s study. And I just read yesterday in a lecture about it now. And
I was having thoughts about the rat study while done online. Because one of the
studies about the rates was not so much they were over crowded but that they
were over stimulated with interaction. And it struck me; the odd thing is
online especially on Twitter, we all act like a bunch of angry rats. But the
truth is that we’ve all the space in the world. We have unlimited virtual
space. There is no reason we should feel overcrowded and get grumpy. We should
just be able to walk around anything that displeases us. We should all be in
harmony and happiness because we can ignore anything we want. Why don’t we? I
don’t have an answer to that.
Leo: Because I think most people’s minds, anyway our
minds are interested in dissenting points of view. And maybe we even like a
little bit of conflict and argument. I like it. Not in moderation but I enjoy
the healthy back and forth.
Gina: I mean I think your experience is sort of defined
by who you follow as well. I don’t know that I see a whole lot of debate. And
partially that’s just my personality. I don’t love conflict. So you know I was
just actually just talking to my coworkers about two people I follow who just
got into it. In the middle of the night, and it got weird and mean. And it made
me uncomfortable. And I was bummed out. And I know that this is kind of lame,
and that conflict shouldn’t bug me so much. But I just don’t see that, that
often. When I do see it, it makes me sad and I tend to either unfollow or mute
or whatever. But most of the folks that I follow are pretty chill. So I think
that Jeff in particular invites debate because he’s a write and because he
inserts opinion. And people engage him with that. But I don’t know if everyone
uses Twitter in that same way.
Leo: No, in fact I think I’m the same as you, Gina.
Mommy and daddy are fighting, oh no! I don’t like conflict. I will go to great
lengths to avoid conflicts, even if I’m getting crappy service.
Gina: I enjoy debate but once it gets personal and people
start to call names, which happens so quickly it feels like. Particularly on
Twitter, it gets bad for me.
Leo: Not just Twitter. It’s
the same everywhere. That’s social media. And maybe that’s the flaw. That we’re
not getting real conversations; we’re getting flame wars.
Jeff: That goes back to Mike’s point last week about
Google Plus. Is that you actually can have conversations there, which requires
control. There’s this gap between openness where anything can happen and
control where you can have civility.
Leo: Let’s teach our kids to have respectful debates.
Jeff: The answer is not a technological answer. The
answer is a matter of societal norms and we’re trying to figure out and get
used to this. Back into my techno-panic from years panic when
I was doing research. And there was, right after the telegraph started,
there were novels about women being seduced by men over the telegraph.
Leo: If only!
Jeff: One of them was a famous novel and…
Leo: I love you, stop. Please kiss me, stop.
Jeff: I think it was Clive Thompson who reviewed one of
them recently. And it’s pretty amazing stuff. But society didn’t know what to
do. Oh my God, if you think about it, the telegraph was the first opportunity
to have a live conversation with someone at distance. You couldn’t have done
that before. And that freaked people.
Leo: Well think about it. You never would have a flame
war or trolling in person. Face to face, people are more respectful.
Jeff: Here it is, if you want to read. Wired love, a romance of dots and dashes. By Elle Cheva Thare, if you want to look
it up, Chad.
Leo: I have it here. It’s a good read, 1880. Wow.
Jeff: 1880.
Leo: It’s a romance novel.
Jeff: It’s Clive Thompson who reviewed it and said it
was actually surprisingly relevant.
Leo: Collision detection. Wired love,
a romance of dots and dashes by Ella Cheva Thare. The old, old story in a
new, new way. MDCCLXXX; 1880. Miss Natty
Rodgers, telegraph operator; lived as it were in two worlds. The
one, her office to proportions. Flinty in its
parsimony.
Gina: Parsimonance.
Leo: Oh you remember my speaking of wondering whether a
gentleman or lady. Oh yes, Quimby remembered and
fidgeted in his chair. He proved to be a gentleman. Oh yes, exactly you know, responded Quimby, looking anything but elated. Must be really romantic and fascinating talking to somebody so far
away. A mysterious stranger one has never seen. I should get up a nice
little sentimental affair immediately; I know I should! Yes, telegraphy has it’s romantic side. It would be dreadfully dull if it did
not. Wow. Very interesting.
Jeff: Love in dots and dashes.
Leo: That is great. So what is this? I’m just reading
this Claire Kane Miller and I realized this is a new thing that New York Times
started called the Up Shot.
Jeff: It’s their answer to box and 538.
Leo: So it’s the Times but it’s like the snappy.
Jeff: Data, we use data here.
Leo: Yea, an opinion. Like you don’t want me to recline
in my airline seat, well you can pay me by Josh Barr. That’s right above Claire
Kane Miller’s How Social Media Silents Debate and
Don’t Get Mad if Burger King Gets Canadian. This is not your father’s New York
Times.
Jeff: It’s trying to have that perspectivey thing.
Leo: This is where they put their interactive charts.
Gina: Data-viz.
Leo: Data-viz. Interesting. So this is to appeal to the
internet generation or something?
Jeff: Yea.
Leo: It’s web-only, there’s no newspaper version of
this?
Jeff: I don’t know if they quote some stuff in the paper
or not. I actually never look at the paper. I haven’t the faintest idea.
Leo: This story is quite interesting. Uber’s secret
agent. So you see what Uber; and the Verge
gets credit by the way for the great big scoop; what Uber has been trying to do to Life. Now Uber and Lift are
ride-sharing services. They’re kind of disintermediating taxi cabs. They use
apps on your smartphone to order a ride. And you gets all sorts of nice features. Like you can see where the driver is and so forth.
Lift is somewhat more down-market. They have pink mustaches on their cars. And
the car can be older. Uber, the car has to be newer. Uber has Uber-X which is a little more like Lift. But
apparently because this market is a zero-sun market, every ride Lift gets is a
ride Uber won’t. And vice versa. Uber’s been resorting to some pretty dirty tactics.
Jeff: Now there’s arguments about this; that whether Uber’s goal was to waste
money on Lift. Or if Uber’s goal
was to just recruit drivers from Lift.
Leo: I think it’s the latter. They have operation slog.
And the idea is that they hired considerable number of street operatives who
get paid only on commission, $750 according to the Verge, for every Lift driver
they seduce over to the Uber side. And what these guys is they get a burner phone. They’re supposed to
move around on different street corners, call for a Lift cab. Get in the cab,
and start a conversation with the aim of getting that driver to become an Uber driver. How much better it is, and blah blah blah. The
problem is of course is once you’ve done that once, you don’t want somebody
else doing the same thing. And you don’t want to get; so apparently there’s a
considerable number of cancellations when people realize oh I’ve talked to that
guy already.
Gina: Oh, so that’s where the cancellations are
happening.
Jeff: That’s the story now.
Leo: CNN had reported that Uber employees had ordered then cancelled more than 5000 Lift rides. And this number from Lift, of course. Lift says Uber’s flat-out lying to their customers. I have to say
even if it’s just recruitment, it’s very aggressive.
Gina: Extremely.
Jeff: Unfair to those drivers who get cancelled.
Leo: And unfair to the rider who doesn’t get a ride
because some…
Jeff: To that matter, demand pricing, if the demand
seems unofficially high, it raises the pricing for everybody, doesn’t it?
Leo: I think the Verge has done some very good
reporting here. They’ve got the documents, they’ve talked to slog recruit’s. By the way, Uber has
responded by reminding slog recruit’s that they have
signed an NDA and they are not to speak to the press.
Jeff: It’s also interesting that there is obviously an
Edward Snowden of the cab world here.
Leo: There’s a leaker, or two! But these leakers are
leaking out the documents and so forth. And this is all over the country. Thousands of them. I think the Verge has nailed them. Even if it’s not cancelling rides. And I believe that is
probably just a side effect. Not that anybody minds.
Jeff: Just for a second, just for the sake of argument. If they were try to lose them business. It’s just like
click-fraud. I’m going to cost my competitor money. Is that illegal? Under what
laws is it illegal?
Leo: It’s anti-competitive.
Jeff: Is that what it would be?
Leo: I’m sure that could be interpreted as some sort of
anti-competitive.
Jeff: It’s fraudulent behavior.
Leo: I tell you, it makes me not want to ride either Uber or Lift.
Gina: Why not Lift?
Leo: I don’t know. I feel like Lift is also sort of
stirring the pot here.
Gina: How so?
Leo: Because they’re the ones who said, hey 5000 rides
cancelled.
Jeff: These guys should be saying our highest priority
is that you have a safe ride accommodated to your destination. And that’s what
they should be concentrated on. And by concentrating on this who-ha,
it makes me wonder who much they really care about customer service. They’re
just a volume business like the manufacturer of my light switch.
Leo: Again with the flinty parsimony! For the most
part, ambassadors work at events or on college campuses promoting Uber as a cheap and easy way of getting around town; that
goal to recruit riders, Uber calls slanging. But
since at least mid-summer, some brand ambassadors in New York have been turning
their users against Lift. Using Uber-provided phones and
credit cards. The contractors hail rides, strike up conversations with
the Lift drivers and attempt to sign them up before they arrive at their
destination. In other cities, recruiters travel with driver kit’s that include
iPhones and everything else a driver needs to get started on Uber. By the way, it’s not illegal although the companies
discourage it for drivers to drive for both Lift and Uber,
to have both.
Gina: Haven’t these drivers… I feel really conflicted
about this whole thing. Because on one hand, being ruthlessly competitive; is
it illegal or not? I find the whole thing distasteful.
Leo: It’s illegal to order a pizza, to prank somebody
by having a pizza delivered to their house. It’s the same thing.
Gina: The cancellations are horrible, but the actual
rides where the Uber folks are paying Lift to give them the ride but having this conversation with
them in the car. That doesn’t seem; but I find it distasteful. But as a
business owner, it makes me question where are my lines? Uber’s very aggressively trying to recruit drivers.
The first question that came into my mind is these drivers are aware that Uber exists, right? They’ve clearly tried Lift. It’s
interesting to me and sounds like Uber is giving
these Lift drivers the harder sell; that they didn’t know before. I have always
felt weary of Uber. Part of it is that they’re
getting built into all these different apps, including Google Maps. It feels
like there’s this classes thing going on. The Uber helicopters to the Hamptons; it just feels so, I don’t
know. It feels sketchy to me.
Jeff: I think it’s a brand issue.
Leo: Well now that it’s out, it’s black mark against Uber for sure.
Gina: Yea. And yet everyone seems to think they’re the
best way to get a ride. And you hear the Uber-ization of everything. Uber is this model for what startups should
be. Or like certain kinds of innovation should be; and that also makes me
nervous.
Leo: There may be a little under current of startups
where there’s such drive to succeed and turn and to grow and to appeal to the
investors. And make sure they’re happy, that maybe you crossed the line a
little bit because of it.
Gina: Yea, growth hacking and stupid back-handing tricks
to pump up page views or get users. This is part of it.
Jeff: It’s when we operate by the wrong metrics in what
you measure. What we talked about last week.
Leo: Isn’t Uber beloved
because they’re modern, they’re cool. They wouldn’t do this kind of stuff.
They’re the good guys.
Jeff: They’re empowering you to get a cheap ride.
They’re empowering the driver to make a living doing this. They could be so
above it. But this is where the metrics come in. But who is judging their
success? It’s not riders or drivers at all. It’s investors.
Leo: Yea.
Gina: They deliver kittens, they deliver ice cream. It’s
this high end feeling; it feels like a premium service. Like you’re getting
treated like a rich and famous person.
Jeff: By the way, when you get in an Uber card, do you get in the front or back?
Leo: The back! Why would you sit in the front? What are
you a commie?
Jeff: Yea.
Leo: On the Lift I would sit in the front. In the Uber, I’m in back, baby.
Jeff: Really?
Leo: Oh yea.
Gina: Because the brand difference?
Leo: Yea. It’s the difference between a Lincoln
Continental and a Toyota Celica. With Lift, I’m getting in the front seat
because it’s a lift from my buddy. With Uber, that’s
a driver and I’m in a black car.
Jeff: Uber-X, I’m talking.
Leo: I don’t do Uber-X. I’ve only done Uber a few times. We don’t have Uber or Lift in Petaluma. We have a taxi cab company.
Jeff: It’s very nice.
Leo: A very nice taxi company. And
actually I’m starting to like the taxi model.
Gina: I used Uber once in San
Francisco. Ron from All About Android called me in Uber or tapped me in Uber to get
back after doing All About Android in studio. Here in Brooklyn, I call 7th Avenue Car Service.
Leo: Right!
Gina: Local business.
Leo: So you don’t use Uber either? You have Uber, you can do it.
Gina: Yea. But even in New York, it’s just old habits.
Jeff: I never use a cab. I haven’t been in a cab in five
years here.
Leo: Wow.
Jeff: Maybe that’s admiration and it’s a rare day. I
don’t do buses, I just do subways.
Leo: Alright I’m going to take a break. When we come
back, you guys can pick. I see a lot of stories, nothing just wows me, but you
guys can pick the stories you want to talk about. Of course Google has the
change log coming up. We could talk about Amazon getting Twitch, stealing it
away from Google. Apparently in a bidding war. Oh this
is the slow time. In a week, we’re going to have new iPhones, maybe even new iWatch is the rumor. We’re going to have a new Moto X. I’ve got
a conundrum. I’ve had this phone for a whole month. I don’t know what I’m going
to do next! No, I have a conundrum because I really like the One Plus actually.
But I love the Moto X and I can’t wait to see what they do. And I want the 360
because it’s round. Even if it’s a
flat tire round. LG has figured it out; they said we don’t have to have
a flat tire round. That makes me mad because I bought a square LG. It’s like
c’mon guys. There’s a balancing act between coming out too soon and too late.
And then of course the new iPhone which looks very appealing especially. And I
think now the rumors are congealing around the idea that there will be not only
a 4.7 inch but a 5.5 inch.
Gina: Five five. One plus one size.
Leo: I like it. Big is good.
Jeff: How big is the current iPhone?
Leo: Four inches. And that’s up from 3.5 two years ago.
Gina: My iPhone friends see my phone and they’re just
like what is that? Is it a table-top?
Leo: The world is now divided between the smallies and the biggies.
Jeff: But it feels so normal to me now.
Leo: Yes, you get used to big. And nobody anymore jokes
about, oh is that side of beef you’re talking into? It doesn’t happen anymore,
except for among the iPhone crew.
Jeff: One thing, Gina you were right. The front jeans
pocket doesn’t work.
Gina: Yea, it doesn’t work anymore, it’s true.
Leo: But I’ve always kept my phone in my breast pocket.
Jeff: That’s so nerdy.
Leo: It’s like a pocket square. It’s very stylish.
Gina: It’s very Don Draper, yea.
Leo: No, it is not.
Leo: No, sorry Leo.
Leo: I wish it were. I wish I were Don Draper. God, you
don’t know how much I wish I were Don Draper. At least I have a great mattress.
If Don Draper had a mattress, he would have a Casper! I am not kidding. Let me
tell you. I spent a lot of time buying mattresses, I don’t know why. In the
last couple of years, I’ve bought several mattresses. I got one that was too
firm. And then I got one that was too soft. And now I’ve got one that was just
right. And the problem is, you go in the mattress store and you lie in the
mattress with the big-eyed person looking at you. And you can’t really tell.
Are you supposed to curl up? You can’t tell. You just lie there looking at the
ceiling and go I guess I’ll take that one. In my head, I think I like firm. But
then, so I got soft. But then I don’t like it too soft. Anyway, Casper is
great. One of the reasons Casper is great is first of all they’re very
affordable, very well-made. Very nice mattresses. And
you have one hundred days to return it. So you have more than three months to
see whether you like it. You’re going to get a great night sleep. Show the
video. First of all, this is hysterical. Shipping is free. It comes in a box.
This is a queen size mattress that is like a college refrigerator size. So you
open the box; by the way I didn’t do it right. They say open the box where you
want your mattress to be. I opened it in the foyer. But that’s okay. It comes
with a little opener; it has Ty-Vek sleeve. You open
it up and then it goes fwoof! It plumps. And now
you’ve got a really comfortable mattress using just the right combination.
Watch this; premium latex and memory foam. Which is just what
I want. So it’s soft on top with a firm underneath. I can’t describe it;
it’s great. Long-lasting comfort and support. Very affordable. You buy it online, completely risk-free
because you have free delivery and painless returns with 100-day period. Casper
people have a great sense of humor. They sent me a book in my Casper box.
There’s Lisa, she loves it too. They sent me Litton Strakey’s eminent Victorian… in a box. Which will definitely put you
out. Thank you, Terry, for that. But it’s really cool. Statistically,
they say lying in a bed in a showroom has no correlation to whether it’s the
right bed for you. And I will vouch for that. These are made in America.
They’re really comfy. They do a great job. They even give you a little good
night book that tells you how to live with your Casper. You can put it right on
the floor. I liked this so much I got one for Henry for his dorm, not dorm but
his house, his college house. And that’s how he’s going to do it, right on the
floor. But you can also put it on a box spring or a slatted base. It’s
well-made, really nice, and very comfortable. No springs. If you’ve ever slept
on a foam mattress, you’ll say where’s the lumps? They’re perfect. But don’t
think it’s just a piece of foam. It really isn’t. It’s really nice. And this
cover can be unzipped and washed. I am very happy. They have a very nice team
there. So I just want you to try Casper mattresses. You’ll find them at
caspersleep.com/twig. And save $50 by the way when you use the offer code TWIG. $500 for a twin, $950 for a king. Now compare that to
the prices at the mattress store. Plus, 100 days.
Jeff: Plus you don’t have to go through all that mishigash, say is that mattress like that mattress? It’s a whole industry that’s made up
trying to fool you.
Leo: Petaluma has like eight mattress stores. And
literally they’re twice as expensive as the Casper. These are really nice. I’m
very happy. When I showed a picture of the Casper on Twitter, a lot of people
said I’ve been thinking about it. Do you like it? And I said yes, I do very
much. You should try it. And of course, 100 days to return it
if you don’t like it. By the way, for every mattress that you purchase
through this show, Casper is going to donate $50 to Child’s Play which is a
very nice charity. It helps sick kids.
Gina: Nice.
Leo: Yea, I like that. You know, they’re really nice
people. Caspersleep.com/twig. You’ll save $50 and $50
will go to Child’s Play.
Jeff: I’m shopping for one.
Leo: I know that if you get it and then you don’t like
it, I’m never going to hear the end of it.
Jeff: Oh no.
Leo: No, I know you, Jeff. And you will like it. I’m
not kidding.
Jeff: More than my light switch.
Leo: Well that I don’t like. No flinty parsimony at
Casper.
Jeff: No flinty mattresses for me.
Leo: No! So, why don’t we play the trumpets and do the
change log? Let’s do it.
[Voice]:
The Google change log!
Leo: And now ladies and gentlemen, Gina Trapani.
Gina: We’ve got a few things today. If you’re on iOS,
Google has released updates to the docs and sheets app for iOS. And this update
lets you open, edit, and save Microsoft Office documents. They’ve also released
Google Slides for iOS.
Leo: Yes.
Gina: Yea, big new feature here in sheets and docs is
you can edit Microsoft Office documents natively. So you can open anything
created in Office and then you can also save those files in their original
Office formats. And you can create and edit Google Slides on iOS now with the
new slides app. So yea, get those before the new iPhone comes out. Hangouts got
a refresh in Gmail. Which adds this new contacts tab. There’s a little tab, it’s not a text label, it’s just and androgynous person
icon. But you tap on that icon and it sorts your contacts by whether or not
they’re online. So it puts your online contacts on top. And you can also pin
certain contacts on top as well.
Leo: I want Hangouts to get better. I feel like it’s so
close. It’s just so heavy-weight. I don’t know what’s wrong. But I really want
to use the Hangouts. I really want to like it.
Jeff: The Android Hangouts app just drives me nuts
because I can’t tell if I’m sending a Hangouts message or an SMS.
Leo: Most of my phone calls are with Hangouts, even at
home. Because I can wear my headset and I sit in front of the computer. It’s
just easy.
Gina: Yea. Jeff, I think there may be a setting in
Hangouts that lets you set different colors or separate different Hangouts.
I’ll look into that.
Jeff: Jarvis
just complains, Gina solves.
Gina: No, but of course that’s not the fault. Because Google wants all your messages to be seamlessly together. Hangouts is still just a little bit clunky in that
area. There’s a big update to a very old app. Do you guys remember Google News
and Weather for Android? It came out forever ago.
Leo: Oh yea!
Gina: It hasn’t gotten any love for a really long time.
And boom, version 2.0 just dropped adding material design. It’s got the card
layout akin to what you see in Google Now. There’s support for local news and
weather for multiple locations. New resizable home screen
widget. It’s for Android 4.0 and higher, and it’s rolling out gradually.
We covered this last night on All About Android and I
though why not just Google Now? The difference between News and Weather and
Google Now is that News and Weather is actually kind of a full-featured news
app with different sections, technology, sports. We get kind of a more
conventional, typical newspaper. Whereas Now recommends news based on the things that you search for.
Leo: How many news apps does Google need? I stopped
installing this one, and installed Currents. Then they let that one go, and
then Newsstand…
Jeff: Newsstand which is okay. It’s not rolled out to me
yet. I think it’s for the news junky. But I think it’s kind of a waste. They
have this tremendous power of Google News, and they’re not using it.
Leo: I’m going to download News and Weather again. I’m
going to install it.
Jeff: I don’t have it yet.
Leo: Oh, I don’t see it in the… so it’s not everywhere
yet?
Gina: Yea, it seems to be rolling out gradually, so you
may not see it on your phone or tablet right away. I really like Circa. For when I want to browse news. The Guardian app is also great. Material design, maybe it’s just an example of
what material design should look like. Speaking of Android, the Google search
app for Android updated with navigation cards that look like the ones in Google
Maps. So if you search for destinations or directions between two locations in
the Google Search app, you’ll get these navigation cards that display a map
that outlines the trip with the approximate travel time, distance, suggested
and alternative routes, desired mode of transportation, and step-by-step
directions. That’s all just in the Google Search results without having to
launch Maps. Of course you can just tap on the card to launch Maps if you want
to do that. And finally, Google Plus users can now import their videos into their
YouTube accounts. So you’ve auto-uploaded videos to Google Plus or you want to
back them up to YouTube, or publish them to YouTube; you can go in YouTube and
go to the uploads page and click on the import button. And then you’ve got a
chooser; you can choose any of your Google Plus videos and bring them onto
YouTube. Then you can publish them onto YouTube if you want. So that’s kind of
a nice benefit of having Google Plus and YouTube kind of merged. And that’s all
I’ve got.
Leo: Oh yea, import video. Neat. I have a lot of video, all of it trivial and dumb. Because
it’s camera phone video. But maybe I should put it on YouTube. Why not?
Gina: Why not?
Leo: Okay, that’s the change log. Play the drums!
Jeff: Alright, Leo. Since you’re the master of accents,
the thing I wanted you to try out today; did you see how you can fool Google
Now into responding to you with a British accent if you use a British accent.
Leo: Really?
Jeff: I haven’t tried it myself. I want to see if you,
the master can make this happen.
Leo: Okay, Google. Wait, everything’s responding now.
Stop it! Oh no, stop it. I hate it when that happens! I’m British, what are you
going to do now? Alright, oh dear let’s close that. There. Is it in the okay
Google that you have to British?
Jeff: After you say okay Google, ask a question in your
normal California accent. And then ask the next question in a British accent.
And according to this unless I’m being fooled by this video, it answers back to
you in a different voice.
Leo: It doesn’t seem right. How tall is Will
Chamberlain?
[Voice]:
Will Chamberlain is seven foot, one inch tall.
Leo: How tall is Neville Chamberlain? It won’t know
that. I’m sorry, let me do something it can answer.
How tall is the queen?
[Voice]:
Elizabeth II is five feet, four inches tall.
Leo: Wow, she’s tall. I didn’t think she was that tall.
I doubt that works. How could it tell?
Jeff: It could be faked up.
Leo: Hello governor! How tall is Mary Poppins? I’ve
better get this corrected before I go to London. They’re going to chase me out
of the town. I think you were punked.
Jeff: What’s the weather in London?
Leo: Okay, Google. Where is the nearest place to get
bangers and mash? You have to stuff it will talk, I’m sorry. How long is the
Golden Gate Bridge?
[Voice]:
Golden Gate Bridge has a length of 8,980 feet.
Jeff: How… I can’t do an accent.
Gina: I’m not even going to try, guys.
[Voice]:
How long is the Golden Gate Bridge?
Leo: Oh, he asked the same question.
[Voice]:
Golden Gate Bridge has a length of 8,980 feet.
[Voice]:
Okay, Google. How long is the Golden Gate Bridge?
Gina: Yours is better.
[Voice]:
Golden Gate Bridge has a …
Leo: That is bogus, absolutely bogus.
Gina: Yea, your accent was definitely heavier.
Leo: Absolutely bogus. That is edited to change the
fact, to change the settings in the middle of that.
Jeff: You just can’t trust anything on the internet.
Leo: No.
Jeff: My favorite can’t trust it story of the day. It’s
all over in my world. The independent reports that the times of London in its
new office has speakers up and they’re going to put in the sound of clicking
type writers to motivate the staff. The staff doesn’t even know what a type
writer sounds like.
Leo: What’s that noise? Do we have wood peckers?
Jeff: Put in the smell of ink.
Leo: There you go! And sweat. Amazon buys Twitch. We
thought, and reported it as if it was true, that Google was going to buy
Twitch. No. The stories have varied. Tech Crunch said that Google blinked. That
Google somehow didn’t bid enough and Tech Crunch was the one who reported that
Google had acquired them. The price is the same. A billion dollars; actually
the deal, Amazon says was $970M in cash. Wow. And the rest was in retainer fees
to people in the company.
Jeff: Forbes said the reason backed off was because
antitrust fears.
Leo: Yes, rightly so. Although well, I don’t know. That
may not be fair. I think there’s enough competition in that space. Why would
Amazon…
Jeff: But what space is it?
Leo: Well the space of watching
people play video games.
Jeff: Yea, I know!
Leo: Antitrust huh? First of all, that makes no sense.
I’ve never seen a company yet drop a bid for antitrust. And Google itself-bought
Motorola. Companies don’t act in fear of antitrust. They act and then if they
get turned down they don’t do it. But T-Mobile and Sprint, Comcast and Time
Warner; I don’t think companies act that way. That doesn’t sound right. I mean,
really. XM and Sirius; these are all things that you would have thought on the
face of it. There’s no way they’re going to get those through.
Jeff: Yea.
Leo: And I think you could make a strong case that
Twitch is one of many streaming services that’s not.
Jeff: So you think that’s a face-saving rumor because
they lost the deal?
Leo: Yea, I think they lost the deal. And it could be
the Twitch folks wanted more money or it could be they didn’t want to work for
Google. Remember, then they’re just a small part of a bigger operation called
YouTube. But Amazon, they probably have the run of the place. In fact, I was
wondering, why Amazon?
Gina: Yea. I was also wondering that.
Leo: Amazon is clearly moving towards creating content.
They do shows now. In fact, my suspicion is that they would have liked to get
the hashets of the world out of the publishing
business and just publish direct. Why not control the content? But they don’t
really have a platform where… they don’t have a live-streaming platform at all.
And so I’m not sure what the overall… it makes so much sense to tie it to
YouTube. Where watching people game is a big part of YouTube. A billion dollars
is a lot for Amazon. They only have about $5B in cash. So that’s 20% of… yea
that’s a lot of money. They say they’re not going to move Twitch to Seattle
that they’re going to leave them in San Francisco.
Jeff: What’s to move?
Leo: Yea, it’s not that many employees. I don’t know.
Jeff: I still don’t get it. I know I’m an old fart. I
know it. This is making me feel older than any other discussion we have. I just
don’t get Twitch.
Leo: You know, I get Twitch much more than I get
YouTube. I don’t get YouTube. But I do understand Twitch. Chris, remember this
is the guy who spent nine hours last night playing Diablo 3. But I would rather
play than watch somebody play. But there are a lot of reasons to watch somebody
play. In fact, I often do watch Twitch videos before I buy a game because I
want to see what the game looks like.
Jeff: I get that.
Leo: The biggest thing I think that’s happening, and Chad’s probably a better guy to ask than me.
But the biggest thing I think’s happening is it’s not much about the game play.
The most successful ones are humorous. They’re funny. And the game play is just
an excuse; just a stage on which they can perform. Is that right, Chad, do you
think?
Chad: Absolutely. None of these people are experts on
the game.
Leo: Well some are, but very few.
Chad: Very few.
Leo: You’re not talking thresh here.
Chad: I would say, two or three out of 100.
Leo: The ones I see Michael watching, it’s not even
about the game play. He’s not learning game play, it’s humor.
Chad: Absolutely, it’s entertainment.
Leo: It’s like red versus blue. It’s like machinema.
Jeff: It was not worth the trouble. But the joke I
wanted to do was to make one of me playing solitaire.
Chad: And there’s people that
are so entertaining that they can do that.
Leo: That’s exactly right.
Chad: They play Kim Kardashian’s Hollywood iPad game,
and it’s hilarious. Every moment of it.
Leo: If you’re funny…
Gina: Well, there’s a lot of comedic material there.
They’re just using the game as a rip off.
Leo: That’s right, it’s a stage.
Gina: But they’re talking about the game and they’re
making fun of the game.
Leo: And they make the people do stupid things.
Chad: If you think about it, I mean the biggest game
currently on Twitch right now is League of Legends. That is not a funny game.
There is nothing built into that game to make it funny or entertaining.
Leo: Well let’s really drive Jeff batty. Let’s just
watch a little Twitch TV now, what do you say? Who’s the best League of
Legends… that’s the biggest game right now; 26,000 people right now. Ladies and
gentlemen, you may hear some profanity here, because most of this stuff is
fairly profane.
Jeff: Is that life?
Leo: First, let’s have pancakes. And this by the way is
where the money comes from. Amazon may just see this as an ad platform they
don’t have. And there you go. By the way, there’s no skip button on this.
Chad: No it’s a 30-second pre-roll that you can’t skip.
Leo: You know what’s really bad, they started the game
and then they went to the ad.
Chad: They let you know you can watch the stream, but
after this ad is done.
Leo: Pancakes. Okay here we go, let’s listen and watch.
This is 26,000 people; more people are watching this than are watching us.
Gina: Okay.
Leo: So he’s got some rap music; that’s not part of the
game.
Chad: Nope.
Leo: So this guy’s not even saying funny things.
Chad: I’m not sure if this is perhaps a tournament and
he’s not saying anything because he’s truly trying to play.
Leo: This is Night Blue 3 playing.
Chad: I mean I would say the same; not getting much out
of that TP.
Leo: He sounds like he’s 12.
Chad: Probably is.
Leo: So this is a guy who’s actually playing. And
people are watching this because they’re learning about League of Legends.
Chad: Yea, he’s also saying game-specific; like AD as in
AD Carry which is a specific type. He’s farming so he’s trying to get the
minions to get more gold so he can level up his character label.
Leo: Why would you do this, Chad instead of just play
the game?
Chad: Lots of people who are watching this can’t afford
the same type of perks he has.
Leo: So you’re watching a high-level player.
Chad: Right. And he’s very skilled. It’s like watching
sports.
Leo: So League of Legends may not be a very good
example.
Chad: It’s very true. It’s hard to parse everything into
Twitch into one stream. And on top of that, one 30-second
stream.
Leo: Let’s watch Rabbit Bong play. So she’s cute.
Chad: Sure.
Leo: Does that help?
Chad: She also has a face cam which is known to draw
more people.
Leo: There’s a chat room here, on the left.
Chad: Yep, she’s streaming that.
Leo: And she’s wearing a low-cut jumper. You’re right,
Jeff. I’m too old.
Chad: You’ve also gone into the deep end and you’re
expecting to watch 30 seconds worth and understand the whole community.
Jeff: That’s like the argument about Christianity.
Leo: I’m in too deep. Well I’m just looking for
something. Let’s look at some of the most popular channels.
Jeff: I know I’m the weird one here. I’m not
criticizing. I don’t get it!
Leo: Well you want to know. Mind craft might be more
appropriate. Right, Chad? Do you see more humor in Mind Craft?
Chad: There can be. But humor is very good. That’s
always going to happen. But streams, you have so much time to fill.
Leo: There’s a lot of dead time. And some of the
viewership is just on in the background? Or are people just actually watching
it, glued to it?
Chad: Most of it is in the background.
Jeff: It says the funniest Twitch user is Wshand.
Leo: You ever hear of him, Chad?
Chad: He may not be live right now.
Jeff: Oh you can’t watch it…?
Leo: Yea, you can. It doesn’t have to be streaming.
Let’s search for Wshand. Wshand dice.
Jeff: No sleep is always good for some late-night laughs
that is Reddit.
Leo: Okay, well I think we’ve done enough.
Jeff: Well you haven’t made me laugh!
Leo: Okay, but there is a guy, get this…
Gina: Be entertaining!
Leo: There is a guy on Twitch that streams the Oregon
Trail. Now that’s got to be; nobody’s trying to get better at the Oregon Trail
unless he’s in fourth grade.
Chad: One of my favorites is man versus game, who’s like
he’s going through basically every game in his childhood. And he has to beat
it, then he moves onto the next game.
Leo: I like that idea.
Chad: Another one of my favorites is Sevenist,
who does Mind Craft stuff. The thing is, is that you’re mentioning people and
I’m just like I don’t know. Because I know the people that I like.
Leo: You know the YouTube people. Or do you watch
Twitch?
Chad: I watch Twitch. I stream on Twitch once a week.
Leo: You do? What do you stream, Mind Craft?
Chad: Yea, Mind Craft. I’ve been doing the Sims 3, a
lot. Modded Mind Craft is normally what I do. From
7pm to 10pm. Yea, it’s a three-hour…
Leo: So you’re playing it anyway, why not just stream
it?
Chad: Yea, well… there’s definitely a very different
atmosphere when you’re streaming it.
Leo: Here’s Monotone Tim playing Roller Coaster 2.
Chad: You probably just; did you just click into this
highlight? Yea, so he’ll have like 15 minutes or so of prep time so that people
can tell he’s live. And then they’ll join the chat room. So he’s probably
playing something…
Leo: This is the highlight?
Chad: Yea, it’s VOD, it’s a
video on demand of what happened in the past. So you’ll probably want to skip
ahead.
Leo: Because it’s saying hold on. There we go.
[Voice]:
Even elementary school teachers and what not. They had to know, like I am the
world’s most gifted fourth grader.
Leo: Yea, you know what. I’m old too, Jeff.
Gina: I’m laughing at Leo, not at Twitch.
Leo: I’m old, too.
Gina Trapani: Not a TWiT show... This is terrible. This is like old people
trying to understand this newfangled gaming screen thing.
Jeff Jarvis: It’s terrible. I mean
this is making me feel old and out of it, I'm not making fun of people doing
it, I just feel like... I'm old.
Leo: Alright. One
more. This is from Gomer in our chat room. He says, "This video, if
you watch this, this is why TWiT is worth one billion
dollars. Day seven, fish versus fish in street fighter." Oh. But first an ad about something.
Gina: It feels like watching the
director's commentary on a movie.
Leo: Not even that good, because it’s
not even a movie you know or a director you care about.
Gina: It’s a viewer's commentary on a
movie.
Chad: The way you're setting it up
though, is basically setting up to fail. I mean, you don't go in and expect to
watch...
Leo: Good. I want it to fail.
Chad: Thirty seconds worth of it.
Leo: I'll take half a billion for TWiT and I think it’s twice as valuable. Alright, here we
go. Fish versus fish, playing street fighter.
Chad: You know TWit’s place, oh c'mon.
Leo: So these are actual fish... This is
pretty funny. So these are... This is a fish tank in the upper left hand corner
and on the fish tank, they have created a grid for the
different moves, forwards, backwards... And then strikes, and so basically what you're seeing on the right is the actual street fighters
fighting, according to random fish swimming around. And of course, not much is
happening because the fish aren't really very aggressive. Oh! Oh! Oh! He
actually won. But how long can you watch this?
Jeff: It’s funny...
Leo: No it’s good, I got it, it’s funny, that's good. And I'm done, because I don't think it’s
going to be any different for the next four hours.
Gina: I want to do a video of gamer kids
watching TWiG.
Leo: Yeah, they would really...
"What are they talking about? Oh they're so stupid. Then what
happened?"
Gina: "When are they going to be
funny?"
Leo: "Is there gonna be a joke?"
Gina: "This is entertainment?"
I'm just kidding.
Leo: I've wasted thirty seven years of
my life, trying to learn how to do broadcasting and these kids... These kids
today...
Jeff: They don't know professionals when
they see them.
Leo: Okay, well, there you go. I think
it makes sense if Amazon can put ads on it. I mean they can monetize it. It’s
just a strange business.
Jeff: I think what's interesting on a
bigger scale, it’s the coincidence of stories. But
I've long felt that the real fight here is not Google versus Facebook or Google
versus Microsoft. It’s Google versus Amazon. And we see...
Leo: That's interesting. Wow.
Jeff: And so we see this week, so fine.
Google lost, and Amazon got it. We've seen that with other companies, where
they say, "Oh, I got ya." Fine. We also see... Amazon entering the ad business and
trying to get more serious about that, which maybe you're right Leo, it
indicates something about...
Leo: It’s all about the ads.
Jeff: It is. Content and adds. And audience and adds. Google
bought Zinc, a pretty high end, very high end special effects, in the Cloud company.
Leo: Well that makes sense. They need to
buy more of this stuff for Chromebooks.
Jeff: Right, and
they're going to move... Also they're going to move, it’s now served on the
Amazon Cloud, not on... I was going to get a broom. A big broom and move it
over there. It’s because I moved over so I didn't get the sunlight coming...
Never mind.
Leo: It’s alright.
Jeff: And...
Leo: So Zinc's stuff has been used in Looper and Star Trek: Into Darkness...
Jeff: Yeah, so imagine if you could take
that kind of functionality and bring it down to cloud based stuff for you or
me. That's pretty powerful.
Leo: It ran on Amazon web services,
obviously it wouldn't be running on Google services. Um. So it could just merely be that Google wants a proof of concept, see you can do
this on our cloud. But i bet you it has to do with
Chromebooks and the ability to do more with Chrome OS.
Jeff: The more they move high end
activities to the cloud...
Leo: Well that's one of the main reasons
you buy a computer is to edit video. You can't do that on a Chromebook... Or
can you?
Jeff: Can you?
Leo: Wouldn't that be something? Alright. Your turn Gina. What story
do you like on all of this? Cyanogen joining up with Google, Amazon, and HTC
folks to build something unnamed... They're building something really cool, but
we don't know what.
Jeff: But we don't know what.
Leo: That's good.
Gina: Okay... Yeah, that's pretty good.
That's pretty good. We could do the Aspira story.
Leo: That's kind of... Yeah... Daspara, just a little recap that was the first Kickstarter project that I
ever donated to. They were formed a few years ago, it was a bunch of
college kids who said we can do a better facebook,
and it will be and this is the key, distributed. It’s going to be a federated
system where everybody can run a node, everyone who wants to can run a node and
they're all federated together. They did in fact, do it, I guess. I mean that's
surprised the... One, I thought it was long gone... But
apparently...
Gina: No, it exists, there are nodes.
Leo: It exists and it’s being used by
terrorists.
Gina: Right, I mean this goes back to our
conversation we had last week, where Twitter was removing links to the ISIS
video, the beheading video, because they have that sort of centralized control.
But Deaspira, because it’s a federated network, ISIS
said okay, we're going to distribute this video here. And there isn't one
central controlling body that can remove all the links.
Leo: And in fact if you go to join
Diaspora, the first thing they say is you can't join here. YOu have to find a pod or set up your own pod.
Gina: Not a node, a pod.
Leo: And if you have a pod or join
another pod, then they will federate. And these are all the Deaspira hosted pods. THere's actually a pretty goodly list.
Gina: Yeah, there was this great
conversation on Twitter and I wish I could find it and it was between Dave
Morin and Chris Mancina, and a few of the people
talking about like, the dream of the federated network, and the federated
protocol, and how email is really the only federated network that we have.
Leo: What is federated, what does that
mean?
Gina: Meaning that there's no central one
body that owns it and controls it, right, that like... So with email, everybody
sets up their own separate email server or maybe someone provides it for you,
like Google or Microsoft or Yahoo or whatever, but they can all talk to one
another, we all receive messages, basically the same way, using the standard
protocol. And it’s not controlled, once an email is sent it’s not like any one
person can delete the email from everywhere. It’s a network of nodes that send
messages to and from one another, they can all understand one another and it
works. Right? Unlike Twitter or Facebook where there's
a central, it’s one company and whatever.
Leo: This was Evan Prodromou goal with Statusnet. In fact we ran the Statusnet server, it was a Twitter federated... Ah,
Federated Twitter. We ran the Twit Army for a while. And you could post
something on TWiT Army and would then go to
Status.net and other places... So it’s... I think it’s a great idea, because it’s
decentralized. Anyway the problem with Diaspora is it’s open source, so anybody can host a pod. Including the bad guys, whoever that
might be.
Gina: Right ,that's a feature or a bug, depending on how you look at it, right?
Leo: It’s like saying, "Hey, Linus
Torvalds, there's terrorists using Linux, you got to stop them!" You can't
stop it. There's nothing you can do about it.
Jeff: But it goes back to the discussion
we had last week, does openness necessarily breed bad behavior.
Leo: No, it breeds all behavior. Some of
it will be bad, some of it will be good. Humans are
humans. Until we perfect humanity we're not going to be able to say...
Jeff: But in other systems in society, we
manage to deal with worms, so I don't go on the street and start yelling at
somebody.
Leo: But that's what makes somebody a
terrorist, is they don't care.
Jeff: But terrorists couldn't... Disrupt
normal everyday life...
Leo: That's what they do.
Jeff: Real life, the way they can online.
Leo: Yeah, they do. That's their whole
point.
Jeff: I'm trying to say, is there a step
change here? That says that, um... It’s absolutely uncontrollable or will we
develop norms and mechanisms to... Affect bad behavior more?
Leo: Yeah but norms only work to the
point that somebody is willing to obey them. And people who, like terrorists,
who have a strong mission, to the point they're willing to violate norms. Norms
aren't going to protect you against terrorists.
Jeff: Leo, if I go in the streets of New
York and I started screaming, and I would never do this but for a sake of
example, a racist word. I would get shouted down, stared down, attacked, accused, people would stand up for right behavior again
being produced.
Leo: Unless you were holding a gun while
you did it. Then norms wouldn't help. Then you would have to have the police
come and get you.
Jeff: Right. I wasn't saying that
openness breeds terrorism, I said it breeds bad behavior. So, I'm asking the
question whether that is a necessary condition. Because on the street, we have
an open street and I have free speech in this country, and if I went out there
spewing this, and as long as I didn't need my meds and I were just a hateful
person, people would yell at me and scream...
Leo: They do that on Twitter too, but that
doesn't stop you. I mean, they... If you're a troll or a bad person in comments
or whatever, people will yell back at you.
Jeff: No, what we said was, what we say
is don't feed the troll, ignore the troll, block the troll, let the troll keep
on doing whatever the troll wants to do. So what would the metaphor in Times
Square be? We would all just walk around the person screaming the horrid word,
but I don't think that's happening here.
Leo: I think that’s what actually
happens.
Jeff: Not in New York, no. I was walking
across 44th St. today, some bozo is all unhappy and can't turn right, light
turns, he's still trying to come into the
intersection. I stand right in front of this ass, I point at him, I point at
the traffic light, like the A-hole New Yorker that I am, and say TOUGH! Because he was violating the law. By God, I stood up for
that, he was getting in the way...
Leo: You're lucky you didn't get run
over...
Jeff: That's true too. But you know, I had my norm moment right there.
Leo: I think the world is the world and
open, closed, whatever, if you have gathering places for people whether virtual
or real, you're going to have bad behavior. The problem is that the norms have
to be backed up by more than just good will, because goodwill isn't going to stop
somebody who's actively negative, right?
Jeff: You can have criminals in either
case, but what I'm trying to ask is...
Leo: You have that middle ground guy
who's not a criminal but just wants to act out.
Jeff: Bad behavior. Does it breed bad
behavior?
Leo: People walk around in New York City
naked, and nobody stops them.
Jeff: Or just insulting people out of
nowhere.
Leo: there's lots of people that do that, right?
Jeff: You're fat. You're really ugly.
You're fat. Right? that wouldn't happen, unless there weren't meds needed in New York City, but it
happens all over online.
Leo: Because there's no friction, right.
Jeff: Right, there's no friction. Our
response is... There's no consequences.
Leo: Because you cannot enforce the
friction. It’s a big difference. If you say to me I'm fat on Times Square, and
I yell back at you I'm right there. It doesn’t matter if I yell at you on
Twitter.
Jeff: So, ergo, we are stuck with bad
behavior. We're stuck with one of two extremes, either you're open and have bad
behavior. Or you're controlled, whether it’s by Facebook control or Mike
Elgin's control on Google+ and that's the only way you're going to have good
behavior. Is that what we're stuck with? I hope not. I pray not. Because I like openness.
Leo: I feel like the world is full of
bad behavior, Jeff, all the time, and if you wish you could watch television
news every night and get your stress level elevated.
Jeff: No, that's because television news
oversimplifies isolated situations.
Leo: So does Twitter.
Jeff: I'm not so sure it’s over-amplified.
Leo: It’s amplified. Any broadcast
medium is an amplifier. I don't know. I... No, I think... You're saying,
"This is why we can't have nice things."
Jeff: Right, which is the title of a book
coming out, right, I think?
Leo: Yeah, it just came out. Which is pretty much the same premise. I think we can have
nice things, it’s just people are people. They're going to be bad, they're going to be assholes. There always will be.
Jeff: We deal with it better in real
life, and so my question is will we come up with ways to deal with it better,
additionally or is that impossible.
Leo: No, I'm sure we will. But, there's
no way we can eliminate it. There will be... Bad behavior.
Gina: It’s distancing. It’s the
separation, it’s the distancing. It’s the lack of face-to-face, right? Like, my
wife is at her scariest when we're in the car. She gets upset... Road rage, I
mean things come out of her mouth... She scares me! Seventeen years we've been
married, she scares me, just in the car... And she'll say it, this is the
place...
Leo: It's safer, it's safer.
Gina: Because it’s safer, and no one ever
hears what she's saying, the windows are up. I mean, I say to her, why don't
you while we're sitting next to the other car, why don't you roll down your
window and say that to them? She'll say, nope. I just got to get this out. And it’s
like that, on Twitter and online. There's no consequence.
Leo: But yeah, you know there may be
people, in fact I guess there probably are, that think that one of us might be
a horrible person online, and would like to shut us down.
Jeff: Ohhh Yeah.
Leo: So...
Jeff: I just saw it two seconds ago.
Somebody did a ridiculous thing against me, I'm not going to give them the
attention, and out of nowhere somebody at an organization I respect said,
"Oh boy, isn't that fun!" He knows better, it’s stupid. But that’s
the... Our norm right now, is to, not just to not create fiction, it’s to grease the skins. Why... Yeah, exactly. So why
does digital... What I'm hoping the answer is, is the same with the telegraph,
damn it. People who had sex fantasies with dots and dashes, and then we figured
it out and got used to it, we figured out our norms. The same
with cameras and the same with everything else. My hope is it'll be the
same with online. I believe it will be what I'm reaching for, is assurance that
there's a path of stability even with openness.
Leo: Yeah. But you know there/s always
going to be people who call in the swat squad on somebody, right?
Jeff: Yeah, oh yeah. We'll never have
complete harmony. We'll never have complete... But I
don't want it that way.
Leo: Life is full of irritants. If you
don't want that, you should get a vat for yourself and a feed tube.
Gina: You know, I often think about this
from the tech perspective, you know if email is the one true open social
network, anybody can send me a message if they have my email address, however.
And they can say whatever they want, however they want, but I have even a
client that helps me control that experience. I have spam filters and other
filters that I've set up and other whatevers scanning, and still stuff gets through. Sure. But, this is the point that...
Leo: And no norms are protecting you, that's just open.
Jeff: Because I hardly ever get the kinds
of insults in email that I do get on Twitter. There's an obvious reason for
that, because on Twitter, I'm showing off for people.
Leo: Twitter is public.
Jeff: But I got an email just last week,
after the show last week, somebody saying to me in the second and first line of
the email, "I think you're a dick." And I did email them back, I
said, "Why would you think that I would read past that?" And I
didn't.
Leo: See, why do you even respond? Why
do you even respond to that?
Jeff: I don't know. But I said,
"Save your keystrokes and bile."
Leo: But my response to that is the
delete key.
Jeff: But that's... There's... then you
created no friction to bad behavior.
Leo: Yeah.
Jeff: Then how do we ever get good
behavior if you don't create friction to bad behavior?
Leo: I can pretty much guarantee you
that responding to the guy does not help the
situation.
Jeff: I've had cases where I've called
people on their behavior and they've apologized... Because what I'm trying to
do, I'm trying to argue, listen. If the person is a true dick then there's no
curing them. If they need their meds, that's for doctors to do. But if what I'm
saying, is if otherwise nice and intelligent people are acting like dicks
online, and are encouraged to do so, and there's no friction against that, in
fact there's greasing of their behavior in that case that's when...
Gina: There's a positive feedback loop,
right. There's actually a positive feedback loop, right, where we do get
rewarded, especially in the informative sort of sphere where snark and you know, quips and criticism actually kind of
gets you more attention.
Leo: I guess it’s true that the nature
of Twitter promotes that kind of thing. That's probably true.
Jeff: All I'm trying to ask is, is that
necessary? Is that the end? Is there no hope, other than Twitter deciding that
it has to proof things, and it starts killing stuff. Which I'm not arguing for.
Leo: We've all called for Twitter to
have better tools. Not just tools to mute, but tools to block, ban...
Jeff: Which Gina's trying to create,
Gina's suggestion for this is trying to create a level of friction. Make it
so... Or put it a different way. Gina is trying to suggest a way to disconnect
the circuit of the feedback loop for some people, if they get less attention,
if they know they get less attention, maybe they'll do it less.
Leo: In the real world, I will confront
somebody but in the digital world I will not. I just delete it. It’s easy
enough to delete it. I don't have a lot of it, but there's... By the way, I
don't always do that. I often... That's my policy. I often get, you know, steam
comes out of my ears and I respond. It’s almost always a mistake. So, I know
what... For me, I'm not saying for anybody else, but for me the right thing to
do is to hit the delete key or the block key.
Jeff: All I'm saying is, as a society,
we're building a society online and as a result of that are we building a
better society. And I wish we would.
Leo: I like it. You're right. But
meanwhile, Diaspora there's nothing you can do if terrorists want to use it,
you're stuck.
Jeff: In their case, they're going to the
proprietors and notifying them, and asking them to take it down.
Leo: But what you could do is just start
your own pod. The ISIS pod. And run a server and then,
you know, you could try to shut people down, but... That's part of the problem,
by the way, it’s whack-a-mole. It’s very hard on the
internet to shut down speech.
Jeff: And ISIS is the ultimate troll.
Leo: Yeah, I mean, talk about a troll.
Jeff: There is no stability there, that's
the point.
Leo: So societal norms are not an issue
there.
Jeff: No... So that rests out on the...
We can't rule over everything. That's the problem with technopanic.
Leo: There's lots of middle ground where
you could have some effect.
Jeff: So I guess my use case here, is people who would never do this otherwise. Who are decent,
smart, civilized people. Who either say something
snarky or to me, just as bad. They, "I don't do that, myself." But
they yell, "Fight, fight!" and they encourage and think it’s funny.
They don't think of feelings or the impact on another human being. How do we
appeal to that human nature, of those people?
Leo: Just channel the Dalai Lama. Whatever he would do. What about that? I mean, seriously,
instead of yelling back at them...
Gina: You're asking how to encourage
thoughtfulness given a tool that's built to be instantaneous, off the cuff, the
first thing that came to mind, right? There's like a conflict between building
a super usable, easy product, especially with Twitter. 140 characters, direct
link SMS, whatever. And asking smart people to think before they,
you know, react to something. It’s tough. Part of what we're trying to think of
is, trying to get people to think about... You know what the results of their
actions are.
Leo: That's what you're doing. I didn't
think about that.
Gina: Mindfulness and thoughtfulness
isn't really an easy sell. Right?
Leo: But you're doing it in such a
gentle, nice way. I didn't even think about that.
Jeff: You're creating a positive feedback
loop.
Leo: We're sitting next to someone who
is actually doing something about it.
Gina: I hope so. If we
can make it a fun enough... What we're trying to do is package the
broccoli in a Snickers bar. But I want to make it kind of a fun, delightful
experience but the core of it is, hey. Think about what's going on here, and
what you're, you know...
Leo: Is that really what the purpose of
Think Up was?
Gina: Yeah. Yeah,
absolutely. Making your time online more meaningful. We all spend our
time online, spend our attention in certain ways,
right? And are they making our lives better, are they making other people's
lives better? Are we using these platforms in the best way we can? And
absolutely it was that, from the very beginning.
Jeff: Give us kind of the story behind,
on some of the insights that you offer and how you think that that is... I know
it is. But I want to hear your rationale, your logical steps on when you chose
what insights to create.
Leo: Yeah, we can look at my Think Up if
you want, I've got it up here.
Gina: Yeah, sure. I mean it’s
incredibly...
Leo: So you reward me for certain
Tweets, you say this got a lot of retweets and favorites. I want to do more of
that behavior.
Gina: Yeah, we definately...
First, this is extremely difficult to quantify. It’s extremely difficult to
quantify thoughtfulness and meaningfulness, right, because that's such a
subjective thing. Part of what we do with Thinkup is
let you know how are people reacting to this. Are they liking it? Are they amplifying it? Are they replying to it? Where were you a year ago?
Jeff: If you're saying, "Hey,
Jarvis." A lot of people were retweeting that, saying are you sure you
like that?
Gina: Yeah, and that's part of the
challenge, right? If you mention, you know, you've got me tweets...
Leo: Oh, dear.
Gina: Well, in that case you retweeted someone and you got their message out to a bunch
more people because you got a bigger audience than that person.
Leo: No, no, you see what happened
there? He followed me, I don't have any control over
that.
Jeff: Oh. I didn't even... I saw it go
by, okay?
Leo: He followed me. What can I do? I'm
lovable.
Jeff: Right, so when it says that I
replied to Henry Blodgett ten times last week, it’s saying that we had a real
conversation, and that's a good thing.
Gina: Yes, yes. And again, this is the
really hard problem and just even kind of wording our headlines and commentary
about whatever happened, the point is to sort of bring a kind of thoughtfulness
to it. What do people react to, you know. Who's following you, that kind of thing.
Jeff: Because I've for the last week,
I've... As I said last week, I wasn't going off Twitter but I've really tried
to pull back and I'm doing the Dr. Strangelove thing. On
certain conversations. I might have a smart assed line, I might have
something to say and I just say, "Nope. Not going to do it." I got a
lot of replies to one I sent in to laptop user... As a laptop using, six foot
four inch frequent flier I sit in trapped solidarity of victims of seat back
recliners. So you know what I have to say about that topic, and it caused a
discussion. There were a few trollish comments, but
most of all it was an honest...
Leo: That's one way to foster the kind
of behavior you want online is to reward the good behavior. Not merely to
punish the bad behavior. But... Have a wonderful
conversation, and people look at that and go, "Oh look. If you don't just snark at him, you can actually have a good
conversation." That's one way.
Jeff: So Facebook gets crap for trying to
have a pleasant environment. They might do it clumsily, they might do it badly,
but it is truly a social environment, a Thanksgiving table. That's what they're
trying to be. That's where the PEW study was off, I think. And you can say it’s
too controlled, Mom never lets us really talk, she always gets mad if we start to argue about anything, we can't talk politics at
home, it’s no fun here. You can say all that stuff and it can be perfectly
legitimate and plane as Facebook, but that's what Facebook is. It’s not an open
platform.
Leo: This Tweet got twenty two replies.
Wow. Casper Mattress - $900, Packers blanket - $50, fort made from Casper
Mattress box - priceless. Credit to that to Lisa. That's her joke. But that's
her son in the Casper box.
Jeff: I love Ozzy's cute look.
Leo: He's going... Errrrr? Let's take... This
is a good conversation, as always. This show is full of them. And I'm full of
it, so. Thank you. Let’s take a break, we're going to
have to get your pics... What do you think of Tent, by the way? Is that
anything interesting? Have you seen that, Gina?
Gina: What's Tent?
Leo: Tent.io. I think this is more of
the stuff Kevin Marks was talking about, which is getting your data localized
and this is kind of what you were talking about, federating communications. A protocol for personal data and communications, so you can
federate your social media. Federate your blog posts, things like that.
I think there's... You know, there maybe... Maybe
there is a technological solution we can find, somewhere out there.
Gina: Yeah but the user experience has to
be...
Leo: Yeah, this is... Can you run MongoDB on your... PHP 5.4 Apache
stack?
Gina: Yeah. Just, you know...
Leo: No sweat, no sweat.
Gina: And then you're good to go. Just
SSH into the server, and start it up and you'd be good.
Leo: I wish the world were full of
people who knew how to do that. That would be a good world.
Gina: It'd be a different world.
Leo: It'd be different, but I like those
people. It’s how i got into this, you know. I really
just like geeks. And I feel comfortable with geeks, and I want to talk SSH and
lap stacks. What else do I want to talk about? This. Look at this little box; this little box could change your world. This can mean
that your printer, no matter what, even a USB printer that's not on the
network, suddenly is not only a network printer, but a Google Cloud print
compatible network printer. You could print to your, you know five year old USB
printer that never even heard the word, Wifi, from
any Android Phone, tablet ,chromebook, kindle fire...
This is the Lantronix XPrintServer.
What it does, it will take any printer, almost any printer, about four thousand
top brand printers, and turn it into a network printer, that is compatible with
Google, for cloud print and Android printing. It’s very easy too, there's no
software to install anywhere. There's no upgrade. You just take it out of the
box, plug it in, and you're printing. There is a web interface, if you want to
do advanced configuration but I can almost promise you you won't need to. One XPrint server can support multiple
printers and virtually unlimited Android Devices. It’s $149.95, and they also make an air print version. But this is the cloud print
version, and it supports up to ten network printers, and eight USB printers,
all at the same time. It’s got one USB port, but you just put a hub on there
and you can plug eight printers in there. If you want to know more,
XPrintserver.com/twit, and if you use the offer code TWiG,
you'll get free shipping on your order. The folks at Lantronix have been selling a lot of these because they're such a great idea and if you
compare it with other print servers it’s a very affordable price, and the idea
that it gives you Google cloud print, and I don't know if you've ever used
Google cloud print, but it means I can print to my computer at home, anywhere I
am if I can get online. XPrintserver.com/twit, and the
offer code is TWiT, from Lantronix. The XPrint server. Really
cool stuff.
Jeff: Let me add something to that, Leo,
if I may because I have my cloud life, and I use cloud print and I bought a new
printer because I wanted other functionality like scanning to my google docs.
Thirty six forty, but it goes to sleep and so even for a certified google cloud
print printer, I need the Lantronix because it'll
wake it up, when I'm off somewhere a week, not printing.
Leo: Oh that's interesting!
Jeff: Even with the cloud printer, Lantronix is helpful because it always awake for me, on my
network at home.
Leo: That's awesome. And having a
network printer is so nice, because it means you don't have to put it next to
the computer. You can put it in a closet or somewhere.
Jeff: Right.
Leo: Before we get to the Tip, Tool, and
Pick of the week, did you see this? Recode is now saying we're going to do native
advertising?
Jeff: My Tweet was Et tu, Recode?
Leo: Does this mean that they're
struggling, or does it just... What does it mean?
Jeff: It probably means that advertisers
were saying, why don't we play along. Why don't you do
this too?
Leo: From the day I started doing
whatever I do, people have come along and said hey, would you mind if we did a
show about our product? And I've always said, no. What are you, crazy? We do adds, if you want to buy an ad you can buy an ad. But I'm
not going to do content that looks like it’s editorial
but it’s advertisement, advertorial, that's what they used to call it.
Jeff: I'm sure that the two of them will
make sure it’s labeled well, and all that.
Leo: It is.
Jeff: I don't know if we talked about
this... I guess we talked about it last week, but Ethan Zuckerman, brilliant
guy at MIT Media Lab, and one of the founders of... Oh, crap... Old.... Um... Homepage maker company...
It'll occur to me in a minute.
Leo: Excite?
Jeff: No, no no. Earlier than that.
Leo: Oh, Tripod!
Jeff: Tripod, thank you, very much. Who
needs memory when you have Google and Leo, and a chat room? So Ethan wrote a
piece in the Atlantic, two weeks ago I think it was, saying that accepting
advertising on the web, was the web's original sin.
Usually it’s said that the original sin of the web was giving away content for
free, so here's a sin matching a sin. And I disagreed with Ethan, respectfully
because he's brilliant. And it’s a really smart piece, and I wrote a blog post
in response, but here's the nub of my view of this is we haven't begun to
innovate with advertising, at all. The only innovations we've seen so far are
basically computerizing the processes we already have of buying mass
advertising message opportunities, and creating popups which by the way, Ethan
is responsible for having helped create popups.
Leo: Oh yeah, he wrote that article,
yeah.
Jeff: And he's sorry. And so, it’s going
to sound odd coming from a journalism proof, but we need to innovate in
advertising. We need to find truly new ways for companies to market and hope
that, by the way, media is part of that new method. And advertising agencies
aren't going to do it, because they sell the old stuff. And advertisers aren't
going to do it, and media companies aren't going to do it, but we have to
rethink advertising because if it doesn't work and it collapses and dies, then
media goes with it and we need it’s support. So I was
sad, thats why I was sad to
see Recode take a jump on the bandwagon and I'm not blaming them for it. I bet
the advertisers forced them to and they said we've got an RFP here and we want
you to run these things and they probably had a staff meeting and said,
"Let's figure out how to do it as best we can." But it’s an old
advertorial, stupid, lets fool the reader model and we've got to move past
that. Where are the innovators in advertising? I don't see them yet.
Leo: So here's what recode does.
Normally there's a black banner on the content, but sponsored content will have
a blue banner that says, "Sponsored Content" And what Mossberg says
in his article about this is, "Hey, don't ignore those. Those are going to
be great articles, full of good material, just written by a sponsor."
Gina: Just not one of our journalists.
Leo: And they're also saying,
"We're not going to try to trick you. We're going to make it very clear
that it’s sponsored content."
Jeff: And we're not going to have our
journalists write them. Which some places...
Leo: Both things are very important. But
your point about Forbes, and you never know whether
you're going to re-share a link that you see from Forbes on Twitter, because
you never know if it’s real journalism or sponsored content. That's going to be
true on Record, unless they've got some way of indicating on Twitter... And
what, so it devalues their links.
Jeff: In a link, if you link to something
on Twitter, you say, "I saw this on Forbes." Twitter is going to truncate,
even if you put a clue in the URL as New York Times does, it says paypost.com,
it gets truncated, it’s gone.
Leo: Right. If I ever... I will shut
this place down if we ever have... Can't survive without
doing that. That's not ever going to happen. Ever. Gina Trapani! You... Must have a tip for us.
Gina: I do. This was for fellow Chrome
Cast lovers, such as myself. I still, been living in
New York eight months now, I still haven't unpacked any other. It’s still just
the Chrome Cast plugged into my TV. Two new Apps on Android and IOS added
Chromecast support. Watch ABC, which surprised me, like does the official ABC
app really want you to get that? They do now!
Leo: They used to not like...
Gina: They used to go out of their way to
block it, so when Google TV came out, it’s like, hey. Watch your web browser on
TV. ABC.com would detect are you on Google TV and block the content, it would
say, "Not Supported on Your Device." Now we've seen a total one
eighty, you can cast Bachelors in Paradise, right to your Chrome Cast...
Leo: Wait a minute, I'm not going to let you skim by that.
Jeff: Gina, we find out about your TV
tastes every week and it becomes shocking.
Gina: I'm proud of my diversity. Kardashians, MMA, Bachelor, oh yeah. Listen.
Jeff: What's your worst TV confession?
Gina: I think the Bachelor...
Leo: We just heard it.
Gina: Whole franchise is just...
Leo: Or the day she watched all of the
Kardashian...
Gina: The Kardashians I'll actually
defend.
Leo: Binge watched the Kardashians.
That's as bad as...
Jeff: Watching five minutes is bad
enough.
Leo: We found out when Steve Palmer left
Microsoft, he binge watched a hundred episodes of The Good Wife in two weeks!
Gina: The Good Wife is a great show
though.
Leo: I know, but two weeks? A hundred episodes?
Gina: That's a lot. That's a lot.
Leo: I don't feel so bad about playing
Diablo for nine hours last night.
Gina: Listen, once the baby goes to
sleep, I get to do whatever I want. And if it’s the Bachelor in Paradise,
that's what it is.
Leo: You earned it, baby.
Jeff: What is something you watch with
your wife? Not to bring her into this area...
Gina: Oh no. She judges me so hard.
Leo: Interesting.
Gina: Oh yes. She can't even... She... I
have to sort of do it around her schedule. Right now there's very little TV on.
She and I are watching Orphan Black together, but when I get the TV alone or
the tablet or the phone, I'm sneaking Kardashians and
The Bachelor, yeah. She actually... She questions being in my presence during
that... So...
Leo: Wow.
Gina: She's not very judgey but, in this case she makes an exception.
Leo: Mmmhmm.
Gina: Well, it’s justified.
Leo: It’s justified. It’s justified. So
thank you, what was the tip? I forgot. Oh, Chrome Cast, watch it... Oh you said
another one, what else?
Gina: NPR1.
Leo: Oh, I love NPR1!
Gina: Much better suited to public
intellectuals, NPR1 also now has Chromacast support.
Leo: So the Bachelor or NPR. What's your...
Gina: The Bachelor or NPR? It’s the whole
spectrum, guys.
Jeff: I think one of the most important
moments in the history of TV's switch to digital, is when ABC decided to stream
Desperate Housewives the morning after, and that was saying to every single
affiliate, "Ah, to heck with you, every man for himself."
Leo: Yeah.
Jeff: And we've got to go with this new
thing, sorry but we're screwing you. And so, you know, TV networks are highly
pragmatic. And thats why I
think that's really interesting that you pointed that out, Gina, that ABC
wasn't playing along before. The fact that they are now, says a lot about over
the top.
Gina: It does, now let me just say the
experience isn't great. You still have to sign in with your cable provider, you still have to go through the ads, which I'm
actually fond of the ads. But you know it’s not your Netflix or your Google,
even, but it’s something, right. So there you go. Baby steps. Chromecast.
Leo: Jeff, do you have a number for us?
Jeff: Yeah it was kind of a quiet week,
but the one I came up with was Google's mobile search revenue last year was
eight billion dollars, and you know the rest of media all say that you can't
make any money on mobile, but somehow Google does.
Leo: Eight billion compared to how much
they make on the rest of it.
Jeff: I think it’s like, thirty billion
last year?
Leo: So that's like a third.
Jeff: It’s a good chunk. They figure out
how to make it work.
Leo: It has to, otherwise... Mobile is
where everyone is going. Desktop advertising doesn't matter. So... Both Facebook and Google seem to have licked it.
Jeff: Yeah. We have in the media. I still
hear media companies say, "I don't know what to do."
Leo: My tool is a tool you all know, but
it’s dropped its price considerably. We thought it might when we heard that
Google was dropping the cost of Google Drive, and Microsoft dropping the cost
of Microsoft One Drive, and Flicker offering a terabyte of storage for free.
Drop Box, which is of course solely in the business of storage, is now a
terabyte for it’s ten
dollars a month. It used to be a hundred megabytes. In fact, when I saw what
Google Drive was also comparable price, when I saw they did that I thought that
kills DropBox. Well, they're hanging in there, but as
Paul Therrot pointed out, today on Windows Weekly, it’s
tough for DropBox because that's their business; for
Google and Microsoft it’s just a sideline.
Jeff: But Leo, I was thinking about this.
I wonder how many people hit what was it, a hundred megs before?
Leo: Oh, yeah. Nobody needs all that
storage.
Jeff: Thats the thing. I'm not sure that they're, you
know... What's the incremental bit of those that did the upsell?
Leo: Not a hundred megs,
by the way, a hundred gigs.
Jeff: A hundred gigs. So how many people
are they losing who're doing the... What's the opposite of the upsell, an up
buy? Above the hundred...
Leo: Maybe people weren't moving over
because after all, dropbox is tied into things like
to do text and other apps, on your phone, in ways that these other solutions
aren't. But new buyers are going to be less likely to go to DropBox when they've already got a terabyte from Google Drive, or somebody like that. I think the falling price of hard drives is part of the
engine of this.
Jeff: What's a hard drive? I wouldn't know, myself.
Leo: Shut up. But that's because you
have hard drives in the sky. Your stuff is still on hard drives, Jeff.
Jeff: I do, I do. I just read... Have you
heard about, um... Whiskey Tango
Foxtrot?
Leo: The book.
Jeff: The book.
Leo: I just ordered it on audible, I
can't wait. Is it good?
Jeff: I listened to it on Audible, and
the performance is great. The book, you're going to love it. One of the
little... It’s not very sci fi ish,
but one of the little sci fi tricks is that the
computers in it are organic.
Leo: Aha.
Jeff: It really starts to make you think
of interesting ways that we presume that there's these hard
elements making things, and then just kind of throw away. I'm not
spoiling anything.
Leo: It’s a techno thriller, Gina.
Gina: Oh, this looks amazing. I'm reading
the Amazon listing here, this sounds great.
Jeff: Even though it’s somewhat dystopian
about public and privacy and data and all that kind of stuff, I enjoyed the
hell out of it. It’s wonderfully written. Just word choices and turns of phrase that are just delightful throughout the entire... You
know, it is what it is. The characters are good, and the writing and the
performance in the audio book is excellent.
Leo: And the hero's named Leo, so I'm
going to like that. He's a... And whatever it is... An
unhinged, trustafarian. What's a trustafarian?
Jeff: Trust fund.
Leo: Oh, trustafarian.
I get it! He's a flinty trustafarian! Whiskey Tango Foxtrot by David Shefford. I saw the New York Times article review which said it’s probably the book of
the summer, so I immediately got it on Audible so it’s probably my next Audible
book. And that was not an Audible add, nor was it native advertising. Somebody
said Leo, you do native advertising every time you do an Audible add, because
you have books. That's not. That's different, that's an add in which content has been inserted. Not content which an ad has been inserted, it’s
exactly the opposite of native advertising.
Jeff: In some fairness, radio host read
spots are in a sense what native advertising wants to be, because they want to
be in the voice. But a good radio pro, like you, changes your voice, "Now it’s
time to talk about..."
Leo: Yeah, you know it’s an add.
Jeff: You're saying it outright, and
you're giving every possible signal that you can.
Leo: And I do have to do the ads,
because there's no one else to do them for me.
Jeff: The only issue is, is anyone confused. No one, if you sat down and quizzed anyone who watches the
show or listens to the show, even listens without the visual cues that you have
on the screen, I don't think you would have anyone who'd be confused about
whether or not this has turned into This Week in Mattresses.
Leo: And one of the things we do is we
make sure that people like Jeff and Gina, the co-hosts who are on all of our
shows, are never asked to read ads. The ads are read by staff, staff
announcers.
Jeff: And I actually kind of violate the
rule when I toss in and say something about the Print Server.
Leo: I'm not going to stop you.
Jeff: It’s not my rule!
Leo: I ain't going to stop you. But we never, ever would require you or ask you to.
Furthermore, we often ask our hosts whether they'd be okay with that add. We actually, I say often because I realized that we
never asked you if you had a problem with Casper Mattresses, but I don't think
you do.
Jeff: I think you're the one that has a
problem with sleep.
Leo: I do! Two thirty AM...
Jeff: You stayed up... Because you're
dreading going home to your pillow?
Leo: It’s because I have such an
uncomfortable buckwheat pillow waiting for me! No I was using the buckwheat
pillow during my nine hour marathon.
Jeff: I don't want to know what you were
doing with it.
Leo: I'm kind of with you, in fact, when
we first started doing adds in this network, a lot of
people outside of the US who were not used to that kind of host read add, were
kind of upset. Because hosts in for instance, the UK, never read adds.
Jeff: Because most of the stations there
are government run...
Leo: So they don't have ads at all. Frankly, but... It’s because... There's no one else. I had
to read the add. And none of our advertisers have
radio ads, or TV ads. I just had to read the add.
Jeff: It would so not work on this
network, to throw on a thirty.
Leo: Yeah, I feel like it'd be more of
an interruption than what we do, even though it'd be quicker.
Jeff: I can see it being an interruption.
Do you get requests to use advertisers thirties?
Leo: I'd be glad to if they asked me to.
Nobody has ever asked. Of course they far prefer the native advertising.
Jeff: Yeah, yeah.
Leo: Now I'm feeling guilty!
Gina: No!
Leo: I just want to be able to pay the
rent! Dinner and go shopping. I just want to live!
Gina: Play a little video games.
Leo: Play video games. Hey, at sixty dollars,
those are expensive video games!
Jeff: You've got to pay your Comcast
bill.
Leo: I just paid two, not one, but two
college tuitions.
Jeff: Ohh.
Leo: That's fun. That's fun. That's
going to go on for three more years.
Jeff: You thought it was going to be
syncopated, didn’t you?
Leo: It should have been syncopated, but
Abbey took time off and now I'm screwed. They're actually now in the same year.
They’re both sophomores.
Jeff: And the cost goes up too. Looking
at prices, there was some school that some time ago, and I forget what one it
was, that if you got accepted they froze the tuition.
Leo: I like that!
Jeff: That would have been cool.
Leo: Four years, and out! That school is
now out of business, ladies and gentlemen. Jeff Jarvis is a professor at a
school that teaches people how to be good citizens, a city university of New York, he has offices there on Times Square. And we are
really glad to have him as part of the show. The last public
intellectual.
Jeff: No, don't say that! I make no such
claims!
Leo: He writes books, ladies and
gentlemen!
Jeff: I'm a schmuck and a slob!
Leo: He blogs, he meets with presidents,
world leaders. He goes to the World Economic Forum in Davos. What more could
you ask for? Gina Trapani and I are public geeks. I'm proud to be a public
geek.
Gina: You should be. You are a public
geek. You're amazing, Leo. See I have to sit in front of my webcam like a
couple of hours a week, but you're just out there all the time.
Leo: You know what, the best part about
my job is, I get to talk with people like you, and so it’s not hard. It’s fun. It’s
like sitting down, I arrange my life so that I would get to sit down and talk
to really great people about really interesting stuff for hours a day.
Gina: Have a good chat.
Leo: Wow, how did that happen?
Gina: It’s good. We're pretty lucky.
Leo: Yeah, we are. Gina Trapani of
course, is at Think Up, and you must go and get your free trial at ThinkUp.com.
It makes you a better Tweeter.
Gina: Yeah! We're doing our job, it does,
sure!
Leo: I had no idea that that was kind of
the thinking, but you're absolutely right, it does.
Jeff: I get it fully now.
Gina: It’s a disconnect between what Analytics are and what they should do, and we're definitely
struggling with it. We're trying our best and it’s just in the beginning
stages, but yeah. That's the idea.
Leo: But of course, it’s Emil/Gina
Trapani, of course it is going to be a good thing. Would you get Emil on the
show sometime?
Gina: He would love... Yes, absolutely,
he would love that.
Jeff: We tweeted about that this week, that people were saying that Emil you should be on
more shows and he mentioned TWiG and how we'd like to
disagree with them. I'm going to disagree with you Emil. So stop that.
Leo: Chad Makin, no... Next week, let’s
see if we can get Emil on.
Gina: I'd like to have him on, and I
didn't really push for it because he's my business partner and I didn't want to
overrun the joint...
Leo: I've known Emil for ages, as I
think most people in the business have. I met him first when he was working for SixApart. And, I was a big... I used Vox, their kind of consumer version but I also used the, in
fact, before it even came out... Their blog platform which is escaping me
now... Typepad. And they lived in Petaluma, you know. They were local.
Jeff: You know I just thought of a
Christmas present you can get Emil now. A love story in dots
and dashes.
Gina: Yeahhh.
Leo: Ben and Nina Trot. There's the names. They lived in Petaluma.
Gina: That's funny, that's so funny.
Leo: And I was an early beta user of Typepad. I loved Typepad.
Gina: Wow. We'll get Email on, I'd love to have him on. It'll be a lot of fun.
Leo: Alright, thanks Gina, thanks Jeff.
Thanks to all of you for joining us. We do This Week in Google, it’s my last show of the week. This is my Friday night!
Gina: Good for you!
Leo: Yeah, 1pm Pacific!
Gina: Play video games.
Leo: You got it, baby. I've got the
mattress in front of the TV, the joystick's all fired up! I got my big gulp!
The hot pockets, I'm ready to...
Jeff: I have a question. You get home
after twenty three hours straight of game playing, what does Lisa say?
Leo: She was fast asleep. We haven't
spoken since then.
Jeff: What did she say today?
Leo: I didn't get home, I was at home, I was in my office playing. I was home.
Jeff: You go upstairs, the next day, she
says, "Where were you?"
Leo: No, she knows what I was doing.
Jeff: Did she laugh?
Leo: She came about nine o'clock and she
said, "So are you going to play this all evening?" I said yeah, if
you want to watch something we can watch something. She said, it’s fine, I just wanted to check in. What did you do, we have
like eighteen TV's, it’s not like...
Jeff: I know, but does she think you're
nuts?
Leo: Do you think I'm nuts?
Jeff: That's love.
Leo: She loves me, and she knows. I
don't do this all the time, I'm not like a hardcore gamer. Once in a while,
maybe like once a year or once every two years there’s a really good game... It
turns out, this game I played all the way through on the PC, but I really like
it on the console... The last one was Bioshock Infinite. It’s only once in a while. Most games I don't... I get them and I
don't like them that much and I play a little, like Watchdogs I thought was
going to be great. So I'm not a big time gamer, but every once in a while... I
don't know if it has to do with my life situation, or the game, I think it’s
more the game. I just get into a game and I play it all the way to the end and
I'm done. And my thumbs stop working, and then I'm done. And I don't play any
more until next time. I should stream it on TWiT.
Gina: You should! That's what I thought
you were going to say you did!
Leo: It’s built into the XBox One, I could!
Jeff: You should have, Jesus, Leo!
Leo: Okay, I'll do that tonight.
Gina: Next time. You've still got some in
you?
Leo: I'm not done yet. Diablo just took
over, there's a big twist in this game and the big twist just happened, and now
I'm going to play. And I'm going to try to be funny while I'm playing. Do
voices.
Jeff: Now watch, Gina, I think we just
unemployed ourselves.
Gina: I was going to say...
Leo: I kick myself every moment, because
we do this little moment when the last one I really liked was Skyrim. I love
Skyrim. We broadcasted it live, Brian Brushwood
inspired me because he does the same thing. If I had just known that this was
going to be the next big thing, I would have fired you all and done just that!
Gina: Hire a couple of gamers with some
personalities, who're good looking.
Leo: Talking about intellectual stuff.
Nobody wants that!
Jeff: I think that was the most
oxymoronic thing you've ever said, Gina. It was a triple oxymoron, gamers with
personalities, who're good looking.
Gina: Oh, man, shots fired! That's not
good!
Leo: And he wonders why people are mean
to him on Twitter!
Jeff: I'm sorry. I feel left out people,
I'm sad.
Leo: Actually you know what happens at
eleven PM tonight? Bioshock comes out, the original Bioshock on the iPad. I might be doing that instead. Ladies
and gentlemen, we do this show in between video games. One PM Pacific, Four PM
Eastern time. 2000 UTC, every Wednesday on TWiT, I
hope you'll watch live if you can. On demand audio and video made available
after the fact, twit.tv/twig. And in all podcast platforms, stitcher and iTunes and all that stuff. Somebody said,
"But you never mention instacast or downcast
or..." Yeah. All of them. all of those. And I encourage you to subscribe, because this is our big thinkers
show. It’s a show where we learn, we discuss, we talk!
Thank you for joining us, we'll see you next time, on TWiG.